↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity of upper respiratory specimens from COVID-19 patients by virus isolation using VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity of upper respiratory specimens from COVID-19 patients by virus isolation using VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells
Published in
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, February 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Souichi Yamada, Shuetsu Fukushi, Hitomi Kinoshita, Makoto Ohnishi, Tadaki Suzuki, Tsuguto Fujimoto, Masayuki Saijo, Ken Maeda, Nozomu Hanaoka, Naomi Nojiri, Ai Kawana-Tachikawa, Shigeru Kusagawa, Koichi Ishikawa, Shigeyoshi Harada, Saori Matsuoka, Tadashi Kikuchi, Hiroshi Ishii, Sayuri Seki, Midori Nakamura-Hoshi, Shoji Miki, Lucky Ronald Runtuwene, Nobuo Koizumi, Sunao Iyoda, Hideyuki Takahashi, Hidemasa Izumiya, Jiro Mitobe, Shouji Yamamoto, Masatomo Morita, Ken-ichi Lee, Ken Shimuta, Kyoko Saito, Masayoshi Fukasawa, Yasutaka Hoshino, Ken Miyazawa, Minoru Nagi, Chikako Shimokawa, Yasuyuki Morishima, Takashi Sakudoh, Yoshihiro Kaku, Chang Kweng Lim, Shigeru Tajima, Takahiro Maeki, Eri Nakayama, Satoshi Taniguchi, Motohiko Ogawa, Takanobu Kato, Hussein Hassan Aly, Kousho Wakae, Kento Fukano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 3 5%
Librarian 2 3%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 28 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 28 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,302,506
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#258
of 716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,431
of 452,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.