↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
408 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
731 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
821 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan AC Sterne, Miguel A Hernán, Barnaby C Reeves, Jelena Savović, Nancy D Berkman, Meera Viswanathan, David Henry, Douglas G Altman, Mohammed T Ansari, Isabelle Boutron, James R Carpenter, An-Wen Chan, Rachel Churchill, Jonathan J Deeks, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Jamie Kirkham, Peter Jüni, Yoon K Loke, Theresa D Pigott, Craig R Ramsay, Deborah Regidor, Hannah R Rothstein, Lakhbir Sandhu, Pasqualina L Santaguida, Holger J Schünemann, Beverly Shea, Ian Shrier, Peter Tugwell, Lucy Turner, Jeffrey C Valentine, Hugh Waddington, Elizabeth Waters, George A Wells, Penny F Whiting, Julian PT Higgins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 408 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 821 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 821 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 1%
Researcher 7 <1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 <1%
Unspecified 3 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 784 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 1%
Unspecified 6 <1%
Psychology 4 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 <1%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 784 95%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#40,566
of 12,698,232 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#795
of 42,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,072
of 266,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#27
of 843 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,698,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 843 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.