↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
422 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
883 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
961 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan AC Sterne, Miguel A Hernán, Barnaby C Reeves, Jelena Savović, Nancy D Berkman, Meera Viswanathan, David Henry, Douglas G Altman, Mohammed T Ansari, Isabelle Boutron, James R Carpenter, An-Wen Chan, Rachel Churchill, Jonathan J Deeks, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Jamie Kirkham, Peter Jüni, Yoon K Loke, Theresa D Pigott, Craig R Ramsay, Deborah Regidor, Hannah R Rothstein, Lakhbir Sandhu, Pasqualina L Santaguida, Holger J Schünemann, Beverly Shea, Ian Shrier, Peter Tugwell, Lucy Turner, Jeffrey C Valentine, Hugh Waddington, Elizabeth Waters, George A Wells, Penny F Whiting, Julian PT Higgins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 422 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 961 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 949 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 207 22%
Researcher 154 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 150 16%
Unspecified 96 10%
Student > Postgraduate 72 7%
Other 282 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 461 48%
Unspecified 201 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 8%
Social Sciences 43 4%
Psychology 39 4%
Other 139 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#41,914
of 13,127,877 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#821
of 43,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,056
of 266,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#25
of 841 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,127,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 841 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.