RT @MasatsuguSakata: 介入研究の金字塔はRCTですが、実験的操作を伴わない観察研究から介入効果を推定する試みが近年盛んです。 ROBINS-Iは、介入に関する観察研究のバイアスのリスク評価ツールです。評価する領域はRCT用のRoB2.0とほぼ同様ですが、割付…
介入研究の金字塔はRCTですが、実験的操作を伴わない観察研究から介入効果を推定する試みが近年盛んです。 ROBINS-Iは、介入に関する観察研究のバイアスのリスク評価ツールです。評価する領域はRCT用のRoB2.0とほぼ同様ですが、割付の評価がより厳しめになっています。 https://t.co/TlnL16ZzdJ
A good starting point for those interested is to look at ROBINS-I, a tool designed specifically for the job (https://t.co/ESuvVSyD6B). This is a very common tool, and is what they used for the previously mentioned Baker et al., 2021, for example (https://t
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/1clrWqZ2cG
@RuthHorry ROBINS, which you know of already, I bet: https://t.co/I7ROzVXl8J For QA, I think most of the times people end up using derived tools, adapted from well know ones or new, but highly tuned to the "kind of evidence" found in the specific domain. [
@PWGTennant @EpiEllie @jd_wilko This is the original paper https://t.co/ZwRr9dhu4M. But I think different designs have specific issues to take care of and hence the development of more specific guidelines, such as Mendelian randomization https://t.co/qzQNT
RT @a_wiglesworth: @LaurenSHallion The ROBINS-I (https://t.co/eubzZEFANA) and RoBANS (https://t.co/SvFuKhqbLm) are two options!
@LaurenSHallion The ROBINS-I (https://t.co/eubzZEFANA) and RoBANS (https://t.co/SvFuKhqbLm) are two options!
RT @sebagz1: @adribaran @jsenior64 Excelente discusión @adribaran y @jsenior64 ! Mi pequeño aporte: hay herramientas para valorar la calida…
@adribaran @jsenior64 Excelente discusión @adribaran y @jsenior64 ! Mi pequeño aporte: hay herramientas para valorar la calidad de los estudios no RCT! Y @GRADEproGDT permite que un OBS con buen diseño parta de calidad alta para pronóstico! Me gustaría👂 a
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
RT @OACerebro: ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en l…
ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) es una herramienta para evaluar el riesgo de sesgo en los estudios no aleatorizados. Su estructura y enfoque son similares a la herramienta de "Riesgo de sesgo" de @cochranecollab https
@drg1985 Something like this David? https://t.co/qjg7iClSn2
RT @TJCoats: If randomised trial are impractical doing better non-randomised studies seems good. I have recently learned about the ROBINS-I…
If randomised trial are impractical doing better non-randomised studies seems good. I have recently learned about the ROBINS-I risk of bias assessment for non-randomised studies. As well as assessing it seems a great aid for designing prehospital studies.
RT @jd_wilko: 2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an im…
RT @jd_wilko: 2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an im…
RT @jd_wilko: 2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an im…
RT @jd_wilko: 2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an im…
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/r2bKQspyvz
RT @jd_wilko: 2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an im…
The Newcastle-Ottowa tool is not remotely suitable for evaluating the risk of bias from observational studies. Robins-I is better. Naturally, it would be better still to try and quantify the bias (using QBA methods) rather than simply estimate the risk of
こういうのあるんだ ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/zzTQVuMQ4E
RT @jd_wilko: 2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an im…
2. They used Newcastle-Ottowa to appraise the studies. Not a credible tool. e.g. Gives points if the study adjusted for an important confounder (bonus pts for more than 1!) Some journals desk-reject if this has been used. ROBINS-I is better https://t.co/qj
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions ROBINS-I:介入に関する非ランダム化研究におけるバイアスリスクを評価するためのツール https://t.co/FuCsA5G9h5 観察研究のRoBツール。実際に使用するようになったので内容についてもう1回復習しないと😅
ROBINS-I is recommended to evaluate RoB in non-RCT. Pay particular attention to confounders and selection bias. Selection bias is distinct from generalizability. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https:
@jon13042587 @sudokuvariante @Elcoug @lhoje @Stalec_ Non on utilise des outils spécialisés (https://t.co/OaXqVG6JAU), roh et puis mince, vous faites semblant de ne pas comprendre, c'est embêtant et énervant.
RT @bmj_latest: A guide to using ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/Tpp9wx…
RT @DrGiovanniD: Una herramienta para evaluar riesgo de sesgo en estudios no aleatorizados
Una herramienta para evaluar riesgo de sesgo en estudios no aleatorizados
RT @bmj_latest: A guide to using ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/Tpp9wx…
@FlorinaErbeli ROBINS-I https://t.co/WgzCpbG4of for non-RCTs
Spending the last few days learning/applying a risk-of-bias tool for observational studies (ROBINS-I https://t.co/sWmZzht2bz) has been a real roller coaster: first, interesting to learn time-varying confounding, immortality bias coming from an experimental
RT @carrieprice78: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t…
RT @carrieprice78: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t…
RT @carrieprice78: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t…
RT @carrieprice78: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t…
RT @carrieprice78: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t…
RT @carrieprice78: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t…
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions by Sterne et all https://t.co/t9YgZLrLQ3 #freefulltext #researchmethods
@Repealist_ ROBINS-I may be able to be used https://t.co/hGIqAHP0Z8
RT @NL_Wetenschap: Deze 'risk of bias assessment' is ook gestructureerd volgend internationale standaarden #epitwitter https://t.co/SoVd…
Deze 'risk of bias assessment' is ook gestructureerd volgend internationale standaarden #epitwitter https://t.co/SoVdpRRbXl https://t.co/SgJPih1vuC
@drabendary @ihtanboga Robins-I is a better tool to assess risk of bias. Appropriate assessment for confounders and adjustment of IPD is critical to ensuring greater validity. https://t.co/X9gUwn06TD
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
RT @ASPphysician: Sheldon Stone has been giving a fantastic and entertaining talk on GRADE in #IPAC #IPC studies. He notes the challenges…
RT @ASPphysician: Sheldon Stone has been giving a fantastic and entertaining talk on GRADE in #IPAC #IPC studies. He notes the challenges…
@Sams_Antics The majority pertain to Health Reviews and/or Assessments (audits), quantitive feedback systems etc. But, the processes seem semi-viable. https://t.co/KW7LR7FSrn https://t.co/6lg5gakClT There was one for scientific research analysis - but I
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
RT @GSCollins: @f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool…
@f2harrell @jonathanasterne @JulianPTH @JelenaSavovic For non-randomized studies of interventions there is the ROBINS-I tool (https://t.co/Q7rlGTUdou)
RT @LATITUDES_bias: @EQUATORNetwork @CaitHowlett @Nieky_WUC @AcademicChatter @ACNS_ECR For intervention studies, consider using ROBINS-I (@…
RT @LATITUDES_bias: @EQUATORNetwork @CaitHowlett @Nieky_WUC @AcademicChatter @ACNS_ECR For intervention studies, consider using ROBINS-I (@…
RT @LATITUDES_bias: @EQUATORNetwork @CaitHowlett @Nieky_WUC @AcademicChatter @ACNS_ECR For intervention studies, consider using ROBINS-I (@…
@EQUATORNetwork @CaitHowlett @Nieky_WUC @AcademicChatter @ACNS_ECR For intervention studies, consider using ROBINS-I (@jonathanasterne et al. https://t.co/qGSHoWGXo2), with ROBINS-E (for observational studies of exposure) under development. Alternatively,
@cwgillihan @anecdatally @Tfeend I am not in the position to have to make those calls either as an indiv or institution, since other considerations would have to be weighed, but if solely re: effect sizes, yes, and I might utilize these guidelines: https:/
RT @DrCGale: Some excellent advice and discussion about including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews at #CochaneForAll: in partic…
RT @DrCGale: Some excellent advice and discussion about including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews at #CochaneForAll: in partic…
RT @DrCGale: Some excellent advice and discussion about including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews at #CochaneForAll: in partic…
Some excellent advice and discussion about including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews at #CochaneForAll: in particular the difficulty in assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies and using ROBINS-I tool https://t.co/1PBD4e4zVq
@lvanbodegomvos @e_ista @drmoniquevdijk @MaudHeinen tijdens onze vergadering hadden we het over de @CochraneEPOC tool, maar misschien id dit ook een om te bekijken , komt uit @bmj_latest en tip via @alsook
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/Hn3JErksyD https://t.co/pbTpDsWMmU #EBP
More info/examples: https://t.co/y8Qe868X6t https://t.co/JcNkrLA9Af https://t.co/5A488wFa5I https://t.co/GGLT1z5z29
RT @jsenior64: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/E79OOLdfAF
RT @jsenior64: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/E79OOLdfAF
RT @jsenior64: ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/E79OOLdfAF
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions https://t.co/E79OOLdfAF
Great blog by @tweettheMESS overviewing the Risk of Bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for use in #systematicreviews https://t.co/ueEKJXg9AA See full #openaccess paper on ROBINS-I here: https://t.co/2OzS7VYceo https://t.co/UGdz