↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
202 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, February 2017
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Trbovich, Kaveh G Shojania

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Other 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Unspecified 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 48%
Unspecified 12 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Engineering 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#103,278
of 13,419,006 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#69
of 1,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,753
of 258,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,419,006 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.