↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 39,102)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
42 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1767 tweeters
facebook
68 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study
Published in
British Medical Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g7015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petroc Sumner, Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths, Jacky Boivin, Andy Williams, Christos A Venetis, Aimée Davies, Jack Ogden, Leanne Whelan, Bethan Hughes, Bethan Dalton, Fred Boy, Christopher D Chambers, Sumner P, Vivian-Griffiths S, Boivin J, Williams A, Venetis CA, Davies A, Ogden J, Whelan L, Hughes B, Dalton B, Boy F, Chambers CD, P. Sumner, S. Vivian-Griffiths, J. Boivin, A. Williams, C. A. Venetis, A. Davies, J. Ogden, L. Whelan, B. Hughes, B. Dalton, F. Boy, C. D. Chambers

Abstract

To identify the source (press releases or news) of distortions, exaggerations, or changes to the main conclusions drawn from research that could potentially influence a reader's health related behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,767 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 33 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Unspecified 6 6%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 33 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#862
of 11,625,520 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#38
of 39,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 256,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#5
of 899 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,625,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 899 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.