| Title |
Polygenic hazard score to guide screening for aggressive prostate cancer: development and validation in large scale cohorts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.j5757 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tyler M Seibert, Chun Chieh Fan, Yunpeng Wang, Verena Zuber, Roshan Karunamuni, J Kellogg Parsons, Rosalind A Eeles, Douglas F Easton, ZSofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch Garcia, Kenneth Muir, Henrik Grönberg, Fredrik Wiklund, Markus Aly, Johanna Schleutker, Csilla Sipeky, Teuvo LJ Tammela, Børge G Nordestgaard, Sune F Nielsen, Maren Weischer, Rasmus Bisbjerg, M Andreas Røder, Peter Iversen, Tim J Key, Ruth C Travis, David E Neal, Jenny L Donovan, Freddie C Hamdy, Paul Pharoah, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Christiane Maier, Walther Vogel, Manuel Luedeke, Kathleen Herkommer, Adam S Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Dominika Wokolorczyk, Wojciech Kluzniak, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Katarina Cuk, Kai-Uwe Saum, Jong Y Park, Thomas A Sellers, Chavdar Slavov, Radka Kaneva, Vanio Mitev, Jyotsna Batra, Judith A Clements, Amanda Spurdle, Manuel R Teixeira, Paula Paulo, Sofia Maia, Hardev Pandha, Agnieszka Michael, Andrzej Kierzek, David S Karow, Ian G Mills, Ole A Andreassen, Anders M Dale, The PRACTICAL Consortium* |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Honduras | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 25% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 250 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 293. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#120,944
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,849
of 64,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,839
of 456,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#34
of 697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.