↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Statin wars: have we been misled about the evidence? A narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
730 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Statin wars: have we been misled about the evidence? A narrative review
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, January 2018
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryanne Demasi

Abstract

Statins are the most widely prescribed, cholesterol-lowering drugs in the world. Despite the expiration of their patents, revenue for statins is expected to rise, with total sales on track to reach an estimated US$1 trillion by 2020. A bitter dispute has erupted among doctors over suggestions that statins should be prescribed to millions of healthy people at low risk of heart disease. There are concerns that the benefits have been exaggerated and the risks have been underplayed. Also, the raw data on the efficacy and safety of statins are being kept secret and have not been subjected to scrutiny by other scientists. This lack of transparency has led to an erosion of public confidence. Doctors and patients are being misled about the true benefits and harms of statins, and it is now a matter of urgency that the raw data from the clinical trials are released.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 730 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Other 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 510. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#27,504
of 17,992,259 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#89
of 5,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,010
of 377,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,992,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.