RT @RxISK: A warning from 2 Cochrane Center reviewers about the future of Evidence-Based Medicine: “By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, w…
RT @RxISK: A warning from 2 Cochrane Center reviewers about the future of Evidence-Based Medicine: “By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, w…
RT @RxISK: A warning from 2 Cochrane Center reviewers about the future of Evidence-Based Medicine: “By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, w…
RT @RxISK: A warning from 2 Cochrane Center reviewers about the future of Evidence-Based Medicine: “By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, w…
A warning from 2 Cochrane Center reviewers about the future of Evidence-Based Medicine: “By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesized garbage with a nice Cochrane logo on it.” htt
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
The @cochranecollab risk of #bias tool is not adequately informed by 89% of trial journal publications: https://t.co/SgnXPHxsBY Using clinical study reports in Cochrane reviews may solve most of the problem: https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu #EBM @BioMedCentral @
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @MartinFierro769: EBM. Les publications dans les revues médicales ne sont pas fiables disent Tom Jefferson et @LarsJorgensenMD Biais de…
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @MartinFierro769: EBM. Les publications dans les revues médicales ne sont pas fiables disent Tom Jefferson et @LarsJorgensenMD Biais de…
Evidence and Ethics both start with an E.
EBM. Les publications dans les revues médicales ne sont pas fiables disent Tom Jefferson et @LarsJorgensenMD Biais de publication et biais de sélection des données. Cela compromet aussi la qualité des revues Cochrane. Exp neuraminidase et vaccin HPV
RT @CochraneNordic: "Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @HengartnerMP: Excellent editorial. The published evidence on healtcare interventions is incomplete and systematically biased. The publi…
"Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM" by Tom Jefferson and @LarsJorgensenMD https://t.co/rUjwS2vprS #Cochrane @BMJ_EBM @CebmOxford
RT @PsychRecovery: Facinating editorial! "We discovered that below every 10-page trial report lies a far deeper and more complex web of dat…
RT @deddingtonian: "By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesis…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @deddingtonian: @C7RKY This will interest you too:" By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be sys…
RT @HengartnerMP: Excellent editorial. The published evidence on healtcare interventions is incomplete and systematically biased. The publi…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @HengartnerMP: Excellent editorial. The published evidence on healtcare interventions is incomplete and systematically biased. The publi…
Facinating editorial! "We discovered that below every 10-page trial report lies a far deeper and more complex web of data and information needing attention."
RT @eturnermd1: SaEBM, pronounced “sebum”, & just as stinky: Selectively Available Evidence Based Medicine https://t.co/QUSgknU8ae
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @deddingtonian: "By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesis…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @deddingtonian: "By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesis…
"By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage with a nice Cochrane logo on it." https://t.co/kWnL5S8mB6
@C7RKY This will interest you too:" By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage with a nice Cochrane logo on it." https://t.co/kWnL5S8mB6
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @steph_coen: "By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised…
RT @steph_coen: "By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
@alyne_duthie They are „anecdotes“ because they are massively underreported in the published literature. The published literature is systematically biased and incomplete https://t.co/4jqXHrk7pV
@alyne_duthie He definitely should have a close look at this editorial: https://t.co/4jqXHrk7pV
RT @HengartnerMP: Excellent editorial. The published evidence on healtcare interventions is incomplete and systematically biased. The publi…
Excellent editorial. The published evidence on healtcare interventions is incomplete and systematically biased. The published literature should no longer inform treatment decisions. Need to look at trial reports obtained from regulatory agencies https://t.
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
"By the law of Garbage In Garbage Out, whatever we produce in our reviews will be systematically assembled and synthesised garbage with a nice Cochrane logo on it."
We penalize industry funded trials for risk of bias and yet... "none of the non-industry-sponsored studies’ underlying documentation was available"
SaEBM, pronounced “sebum”, & just as stinky: Selectively Available Evidence Based Medicine
RT @amtejani: Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journ…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
Jefferson and Doshi are spot on...@cochranecollab reviews will mislead people if they only use data from clinical trial journal publications...need to look at clinical study reports/regulatory data. @CaitO_PharmD @eturnermd1
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
RT @AKECassels: Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7I…
Do Cochrane Reviews always get to the heart of the matter? Hmm.... Maybe not. Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/sV7ITH1q7U @CochraneHTN @Drug_Evidence @DrRitaMc @amtejani @CochraneLibrary @picardonhealth
RT @SuGolder: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/y0lvH0rQ0U
RT @SuGolder: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/y0lvH0rQ0U
RT @merlin_tracy: In HTA we rely on clinical study reports over journal articles, if avail. Payers should make CSR supply mandatory. https:…
Garbage in garbage out. Time to rethink the E.
RT @merlin_tracy: In HTA we rely on clinical study reports over journal articles, if avail. Payers should make CSR supply mandatory. https:…
RT @merlin_tracy: In HTA we rely on clinical study reports over journal articles, if avail. Payers should make CSR supply mandatory. https:…
RT @merlin_tracy: In HTA we rely on clinical study reports over journal articles, if avail. Payers should make CSR supply mandatory. https:…
RT @BellRickyNZ: Nice editorial this in the @bmj_latest that critically examines the 'E' in evidence based medicine https://t.co/iT7CaF6DnR
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/y0lvH0rQ0U
RT @merlin_tracy: In HTA we rely on clinical study reports over journal articles, if avail. Payers should make CSR supply mandatory. https:…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
In HTA we rely on clinical study reports over journal articles, if avail. Payers should make CSR supply mandatory. https://t.co/GbYE2jUlkR
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
Nice editorial this in the @bmj_latest that critically examines the 'E' in evidence based medicine https://t.co/iT7CaF6DnR
RT @pash22: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/CTMzA03c3Y via @LarsJorgensenMD
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/CTMzA03c3Y via @LarsJorgensenMD
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
RT @LarsJorgensenMD: Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shif…
Check out our editorial @BMJ_EBM: "Redefining the 'E' in #EBM" (https://t.co/bp4AeoX6Bu), where we call for a shift from journal publication-based SRs to data-based SRs that incorporate study programmes, regulatory data and IPD. @bmj_latest @cochranec
RT @BMJ_EBM: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/QAaFOYQfiJ
RT @BMJ_EBM: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/QAaFOYQfiJ
RT @BMJ_EBM: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/QAaFOYQfiJ
RT @BMJ_EBM: Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/QAaFOYQfiJ
Redefining the ‘E’ in EBM https://t.co/QAaFOYQfiJ