| Title |
From patient centred to people powered: autonomy on the rise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.h148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dave deBronkart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 74 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 42 | 15% |
| Australia | 11 | 4% |
| Canada | 11 | 4% |
| Spain | 10 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Belgium | 5 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 88 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 203 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 14% |
| Scientists | 32 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#161,378
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,312
of 64,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,847
of 367,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#28
of 1,001 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,001 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.