| Title |
Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.e70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Y T Fong, Judy W C Ho, Bryant P H Hui, Antoinette M Lee, Duncan J Macfarlane, Sharron S K Leung, Ester Cerin, Wynnie Y Y Chan, Ivy P F Leung, Sharon H S Lam, Aliki J Taylor, Kar-keung Cheng |
| Abstract |
To systematically evaluate the effects of physical activity in adult patients after completion of main treatment related to cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 18% |
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 14% |
| Scientists | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 852 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 834 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 169 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 11% |
| Researcher | 91 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 6% |
| Other | 160 | 19% |
| Unknown | 180 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 223 | 26% |
| Sports and Recreations | 117 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 104 | 12% |
| Psychology | 59 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 4% |
| Other | 97 | 11% |
| Unknown | 218 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#359,744
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#4,354
of 65,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,897
of 255,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#16
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.