@Thiohna Some bioethicists would like a word 😬 https://t.co/J51GhI0Kwy
@bananafannajoe @LeftismKills @90sSupreme @BackwoodsEnginr @MoreCowbell2 @CollinRugg @Pismo_B Nope absolutely no references at all https://t.co/2sBs9WmsSZ
Seriously, are you familiar with after-birth abortion? Read all about it: https://t.co/soTEcKDads
Este homem vive obcecado por esta fotonovela. https://t.co/49eUjevj3J
Acho que até 2 meses é suficiente e pago pelos próprios...
@funder Trump didn’t lie about abortion: https://t.co/Vqd3B0W0Wt
Insanidade total... https://t.co/Fbwdjdpbyd
Insanidade total ... https://t.co/Fbwdjdpbyd
@Out5p0ken Legalizing infanticide is very much a thing: https://t.co/2HBSP9g7tt
@TheSurvivors_US Serious people actually argue for this. Insane. https://t.co/XZhUk5TUiV https://t.co/yYwJfcNRsV
@bendreyfuss A few Democrats have given casual mention to it over the years. I think the last VA Gov? Anyway, it is a fringe issue but definitely not made up. https://t.co/qX2ANdyqkQ
@vicky4ms @JoshuaAtLarge "I have a strongly held belief that life doesn't begin one month old" "Four months old" "Three years old" If you want people to pick arbitrary lines that don't originate with the formation of the being, it's a dangerous game. h
@CPTDoomDC @TheDemocrats Hey look, here’s an argument for killing healthy newborn babies, published and peer reviewed! https://t.co/XZhUk5TUiV https://t.co/QvP2J1X57R
@BarbraStreisand If a late-term abortion is performed but the baby survives and is born alive, it has been argued that the clinicians can let the baby die by not providing any care for it. So-called "after-birth abortion" is discussed in medical literature
@_acedie Admettons que le mot "valeur" soit faux, c'est votre discipline et votre sujet, pas les miens. Est-ce que cela change son plaidoyer en faveur de l'euthanasie des bébés handicapés à la naissance ? (Repris par l'une de ses élèves ici : https://t.c
I was wondering this afternoon while watching news about Trump's abortion policy video where this farkakte "after-birth abortion" thing came from ...
@Onemoretime2212 "The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual." https://t.co/dbJYgRS7JH
@funguyhey990 @ParallelAuthor @Timcast In actual fact it is being seriously considered. the conclusion of this paper is that killing even a healthy baby post birth should be permitted. https://t.co/Bl9L7OQukh https://t.co/Pik4e5wUFr
@MikeSington You are the LIAR Sington! https://t.co/Bw8Xw8zzcB
@Sweetestchick40 @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump ...or from MEDICAL JOURNALS... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@susanleona77974 @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump Ignorance isn't a virtue dickhead... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@KevinJa52749283 @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump Being able to change your mind when you find out new information is a good thing bud... There's a reason that your cult likes echo chambers so much... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@920Grill @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump The medical establishment does... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@GorillaGrins3 @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump ...or maybe they are more in touch with the REAL world... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@InnocenceCapit1 @toglesby27 @Songriter1977 @RpsAgainstTrump "smarten up" the cult member says... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@Holt_LFC @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump Try looking outside your echo chamber sometime... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@TwohoundsFL @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump ...because it's true... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@smkanichy @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump Gee, I wonder why they would think that... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@ray_iallonardo @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump You don't? Did you even google it? Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@Rebecca2Janis @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump ...maybe because it IS true... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@toglesby27 @mkultramaga1 @RpsAgainstTrump ...even after birth... Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@IDreamWeave2 @toglesby27 @RpsAgainstTrump Ignorance isn't a virtue... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@invictis117 @RpsAgainstTrump Like it isn't a thing... Educate yourself luv... https://t.co/MALzuwY9Lw
@sunsungirly hes wearing a lot of fucking self tanner. re: abortion after birth, its enough that pro-abortionists are arguing for it: https://t.co/Bl9L7OPWuJ
@MikeSington The License To Kill A Baby👇 “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.” After-birth abortion: why should the ba
The License To Kill A Baby👇😡🤬 “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.” After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? ht
@mistabar23 @marlene4719 @Countcristo44 Post-birth abortions are real. https://t.co/izUZj9GPvJ
@Countcristo44 @marlene4719 Here’s one of the science papers outlining their arguments supporting after-birth abortion. https://t.co/izUZj9GPvJ
@mrandystevens @thefloridarose @joekent16jan19 Found an article from 2011(?) which makes a case for “after birth abortions”. I totally disagree with this. Find it ridiculous bc theyre talking about human beings not a fetus inside a woman’s body. I mentio
What the republicans want and the lies they are prepared to spread to get it in the article below. https://t.co/Z8jiodyJvV
@MediaBusters6 @SawyerHackett @GOP reproductive rights? https://t.co/fn5IWBWxSd
Proof that Democrats want "after-birth abortion." #RoevemberIsComing https://t.co/fn5IWBWxSd Biden's America #LetsGoBrandon #DementiaJoe
@BlackKnight10k democrats: https://t.co/fn5IWBWxSd #LetsGoBrandon
RT @JustDKG: @CountBckFrom10 @combienDUtemps @RollingStone The concept of "after-birth abortions" isn't real. It originated in 2013 in a me…
@CountBckFrom10 @combienDUtemps @RollingStone The concept of "after-birth abortions" isn't real. It originated in 2013 in a medical article where two doctors *suggested* it should be called abortion and it was swiftly rejected because that's not what abort
@Middle_of_Truth @bennyjohnson https://t.co/9eP7Km7Hjq 450 citations, from 2013. They will push this to be the 'standard of care' if allowed, if not fought against protectively. *You* are either ignorant, stupid, or evil.
@Beta_Person1 Your "sociology" logic tends to extrapolate out very poorly. If you want to know why, see "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" https://t.co/S3MHkONs99
RT @athein1: The world that the left envisions: Legal after-birth abortions! https://t.co/FferJevlzM
The world that the left envisions: Legal after-birth abortions! https://t.co/FferJevlzM
@Taigasangare Cela fait longtemps qu'elle est posée... https://t.co/AbqEZ4TdN3
@Liconn54 @RicciGeri Giubilini A, Minerva F. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics 2013;39:261-263. https://t.co/bM7wlMIizI
@1n44n6 @Hatchetpacker83 @Yorkiedoglover1 @ASo1omons You lie. We know you lie. Yet you'll continue to lie. https://t.co/bHldZ3XaSx
@OleAsbjoernNess Kanskje denne logikken kan utvides? "(...) then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn." https://t.co/lPpWLa94qD
RT @LudwigBruehl: Das renommierte Journal für Medizinethik schlägt vor, dass man Babies in „After-Birth-Abortions“ töten können soll. Das…
@Emerald_Rose0 Give people and inch and they take a mile. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/JV50AP3VcI
RT @LudwigBruehl: Das renommierte Journal für Medizinethik schlägt vor, dass man Babies in „After-Birth-Abortions“ töten können soll. Das…
RT @secularprolife: Minerva and Giubilini agree. See "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" - https://t.co/BfErn55Sg4
RT @LudwigBruehl: Das renommierte Journal für Medizinethik schlägt vor, dass man Babies in „After-Birth-Abortions“ töten können soll. Das…
RT @secularprolife: Minerva and Giubilini agree. See "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" - https://t.co/BfErn55Sg4
RT @LudwigBruehl: Das renommierte Journal für Medizinethik schlägt vor, dass man Babies in „After-Birth-Abortions“ töten können soll. Das…
Das renommierte Journal für Medizinethik schlägt vor, dass man Babies in „After-Birth-Abortions“ töten können soll. Das ist einfach nur unironisch konsequent. Und zeigt, warum wir Ungeborene verteidigen müssen. https://t.co/Z8wvtn1WTV https://t.co/iDl
Unfassbare "Argumentation". Oder: Wie pervertiert sich der menschliche Geist am überzeugendsten? https://t.co/t5CbznCeyw
RT @secularprolife: Minerva and Giubilini agree. See "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" - https://t.co/BfErn55Sg4
RT @secularprolife: Minerva and Giubilini agree. See "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" - https://t.co/BfErn55Sg4
@jacelala Minerva and Giubilini agree. See "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" - https://t.co/BfErn55Sg4
Minerva and Giubilini agree. See "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" - https://t.co/BfErn55Sg4
@WiewiorkiIBobry @heretyczka_ Tam już debata na ten temat od dawna jest toczona w poważnych pismach medycznych. W ciągu dekady pewnie zostanie to wdrożone i to wy będziecie za to odpowiedzialni. https://t.co/I4Aa95ZbJu
@wyborczawroclaw Na zachodzie jakoś odważniej podchodzi się do tematu aborcji po narodzinach, jak w poniższym artykule. Pani Gizelo, odwagi! Być może nie 22 tydzień ciąży powinien być granicą dopuszczalności aborcji, ale na przykład 5 tydzień po narodz
@katarynaaa Na zachodzie są już w pewnych, póki co wąskich kręgach (kto wie jak będzie w przyszłości?) stawiane poważne pytania o aborcję po urodzeniu. Bo niby dlaczego noworodek miałby żyć, w końcu nie wiadomo co z niego wyrośnie. https://t.co/BpkQarm8F
@uvanlig After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/1bIdWiNzYG
@SlaggitySlag @Gemma_clark14 You know there are academics who support abortion now calling for legalised infanticide after birth? Up to 6 months after or more? What’s the difference in the womb or out? Choose your friends carefully. What’s your time limit
@drnikhildatar @kanishka__singh Abortions that happen after the human foetus emerges from the birth canal. Check this thread for more: https://t.co/3eD4y94R4v
“…killing a newborn could be ethically permissible. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an…acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.” https://t.co/VOzdCSRsuU
RT @kojanovski: @PBasiukiewicz Nie, nie następuje żadna zmiana genetyczna. To jest jedynie pierwszy krok. Będą kolejne. https://t.co/UZjYuE…
«Uccidere un neonato è eticamente accettabile in tutti i casi in cui lo è l’aborto» Ho letto bene???? Vi prego verificate! Nel caso, alla faccia dell'etica medica... @QLexPipiens https://t.co/hWqIHkGE9j
@PBasiukiewicz Nie, nie następuje żadna zmiana genetyczna. To jest jedynie pierwszy krok. Będą kolejne. https://t.co/UZjYuEaojy
Eh ma la fede cristiana é brutta, evviva la scienza e l'illuminismo La scienza e l'illuminismo: Riassumo: il neonato non é consapevole quindi é giusto sopprimerlo se rischia di farvi saltare la settimana bianca. https://t.co/ZsPgsQL8WL
L'aborto post-nascita. Sembrerebbe una bufala. E invece no, ci hanno pensato davvero, pubblicato in una prestigiosa rivista! https://t.co/KNBoMHrYLv
@CrylJm @BFMTV Le principe du progressisme c'est "toujours plus loin"... 😒 https://t.co/NgbnJxo91m
RT @biifiib: Indovinate il tema dell'aborto post natale da chi è stato inizialmente sollevato? Da un italiano purtroppo Alberto Giubilini L…
RT @biifiib: In prarica secondo l'ascienzah un essere umano non è di fatto un essere umano fino a quando non viene registrato come asset de…
RT @biifiib: In prarica secondo l'ascienzah un essere umano non è di fatto un essere umano fino a quando non viene registrato come asset de…
@KotulaKat @TakJestTVN24 Dlaczego polska lewica nie ma odwagi zacząć dyskusji o aborcji postnatalnej? Taka dyskusja toczy się już na zachodzie, przykład artykułu poniżej. Niby dlaczego noworodek miałby mieć prawo fo życia takie jak pełnoprawny człowiek?
RT @biifiib: In prarica secondo l'ascienzah un essere umano non è di fatto un essere umano fino a quando non viene registrato come asset de…
RT @biifiib: In prarica secondo l'ascienzah un essere umano non è di fatto un essere umano fino a quando non viene registrato come asset de…
RT @biifiib: In prarica secondo l'ascienzah un essere umano non è di fatto un essere umano fino a quando non viene registrato come asset de…