| Title |
Autopsy in suspected COVID-19 cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Pathology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206522 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Hanley, Sebastian B Lucas, Esther Youd, Benjamin Swift, Michael Osborn |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 15% |
| United States | 23 | 12% |
| Spain | 9 | 5% |
| Kuwait | 9 | 5% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 148 | 76% |
| Scientists | 24 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 803 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 803 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 93 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 9% |
| Other | 60 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 60 | 7% |
| Other | 232 | 29% |
| Unknown | 199 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 291 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 153 | 19% |
| Unknown | 234 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
#213,174
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#9
of 4,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,065
of 370,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.