↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
116 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
276 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Long term survival and local control outcomes from single dose targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy (TARGIT-IORT) for early breast cancer: TARGIT-A randomised clinical trial
Published in
British Medical Journal, August 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m2836
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jayant S Vaidya, Max Bulsara, Michael Baum, Frederik Wenz, Samuele Massarut, Steffi Pigorsch, Michael Alvarado, Michael Douek, Christobel Saunders, Henrik L Flyger, Wolfgang Eiermann, Chris Brew-Graves, Norman R Williams, Ingrid Potyka, Nicholas Roberts, Marcelle Bernstein, Douglas Brown, Elena Sperk, Siobhan Laws, Marc Sütterlin, Tammy Corica, Steinar Lundgren, Dennis Holmes, Lorenzo Vinante, Fernando Bozza, Montserrat Pazos, Magali Le Blanc-Onfroy, Günther Gruber, Wojciech Polkowski, Konstantin J Dedes, Marcus Niewald, Jens Blohmer, David McCready, Richard Hoefer, Pond Kelemen, Gloria Petralia, Mary Falzon, David J Joseph, Jeffrey S Tobias

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 189 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Master 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 89 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 34%
Physics and Astronomy 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 89 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1055. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#14,856
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#375
of 64,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#684
of 426,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#22
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.