↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Funding sources are under-reported in randomised clinical trials of biological treatments in sports medicine: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in JISAKOS, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Funding sources are under-reported in randomised clinical trials of biological treatments in sports medicine: a systematic review
Published in
JISAKOS, August 2020
DOI 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000452
Authors

Hayden A Anz, Heba A Ahmad, Adam M Kozemchak, Mayank Rao, Ryan J Warth, Christopher D Harner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,297,337
of 17,175,498 outputs
Outputs from JISAKOS
#163
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,461
of 306,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JISAKOS
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,175,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.