@RayCarr21004845 @RobNicholls15 @DesmondSwayne "Vaccine fully tested..." Wrong. "... and certified" It hasn't been approved by the European Medicines Agency. https://t.co/MLzknnpFYd https://t.co/dgQrnvYsHP https://t.co/2wiCwqpxcJ https://t.co/UVVsAsnEZ
@TSHicks @DesmondSwayne https://t.co/Jz93KVjnFu Emergency licence was granted before phase III trial data was published. Trials are ongoing. This is hard work.
RT @RobNicholls15: Interestingly the emergency licences given to the covid vaccines only last for 12 months. Interesting times ahead. @bmj_…
@PhysicsNerdSN8 @DesmondSwayne It has been granted a 12 month emergency licence. https://t.co/Jz93KVjnFu We are currently months into a two year trial. https://t.co/TaEE970QSl You can still catch and transmit covid once vaccinated. https://t.co/hYxQzRQ9fg
Interestingly the emergency licences given to the covid vaccines only last for 12 months. Interesting times ahead. @bmj_latest @Iromg @PHE_uk @MattHancock @BorisJohnson https://t.co/Jz93KVjnFu
@whiterose_lady @RicSixx2 @LBC @NickFerrariLBC 👎 Covid 💉 is not approved in UK, only given temporary authorisation for 1 year👇 https://t.co/KLRZ7PW14F They’re experimental & STILL in phase 3 trials til 2023 👇 AZ https://t.co/sxMMTtg5Lf Pfizer http
@Dredekia @DMcC94053962 @Mattrelli @Smithdsd11 @deelomas Dear Lord, give me strength. It’s a pile on of idiots who think they’re original and funny. https://t.co/HoGe7zh0go
@SirFrownalot @dataandpolitics This is the article that gave me pause to think! https://t.co/sblh0W2oqV
@EbbySon @GorillaBaz @Enlightenme94 @davie_low @ianbrown @BadCOVID19Takes It has been licensed - not sure why you think it hasn’t been? https://t.co/oCq8HNLYFt and https://t.co/Z4KCv49SKb give further information. What do you mean “legally viable”? There’s
@Arthur57883568 @ThePostTruthEra @NobbySUP @DC_LFC_ @SkyNews Explained here https://t.co/IGTgCafyTZ
Q. Who is asking this question? A. WHO should be asking this question. "How was the MHRA able to approve the COVID vaccine so quickly?" https://t.co/grjJc4kZbV
@SchwiftyJames @cheesedoff3 @JimboJo56189694 Yes I do. 😂 It hasn't been approved by the European Medicines Agency. And the only reason the MHRA was able to grant the vaccine a temporary authorisation was because the government made changes to the Human M
@the_djbmc @cheesedoff3 @JimboJo56189694 Not by the European Medicines Agency it's not. And the only reason the MHRA was able to grant the vaccine a temporary authorisation was because the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations. https
https://t.co/Cvs5ZjgGeF. Oh look John TEMPORARY authorisation
@Pondleg @uwanttocomplain @Demo2020cracy "Vaccinating the UK: how the covid vaccine was approved, and other questions answered | The BMJ" https://t.co/7Lj4ZMenMK
@LockdownManC @GabrielPhinn @17point4million @TelGlobalHealth @Harrietmbarber Can if they want too, but I would rather have the actual EU ruling in front of me that says it is allowed. The article does mention tho that most EU countries were waiting for EM
@shirleyjones999 @naomirwolf The only emergency aspect was for MHRA to act under its own auspices & not wait for EMA, see here: https://t.co/pJi6Yrpt93 Were you a vote leave-r? If so this is the sort of thing you voted for, sovereignty! Of course it's
@RobL_L @ac_bax @Crewedaddy @alistaircoleman You don’t provide any evidence for any of your assertions. I’m reporting you too. The Pfizer vax has only received temporary authorisation for emergency use. https://t.co/5xOvuFR3xR
TEMPORARY. FOR ONE YEAR!! Interesting reading! Vaccinating the UK: how the covid vaccine was approved, and other questions answered https://t.co/JkdMSGS40j
@Alberto___x @francessmith @SmithsonJuan In October the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 to allow the MHRA to grant temporary authorisation of a covid-19 vaccine without needing to wait for the EMA. https://t.co/ASlUHzAEWH.
@iancoupy @PdRoberts1968 @davidschneider You do realise that we could have still taken the vaccine before it was officially approved while we were still in the EU? It's a bit like those blue passports. We could've had any colour passports we wanted https
@chevaans @NellyFunk123 @naturaltosmile @_zsipod_ @jamestabor @RishiSunak You realise that covid vaccine was approved when the UK was still in the EU? Countries still within the EU can do their own thing and approve vaccines? “in an emergency EU countries
Rather worrying! https://t.co/Jz93KVjnFu https://t.co/WKYJ6p7Kw9
@Rolo_Tamasi @WatchmanTimmy @MattChorley Incorrect on every statement 😂 John Hopkins University & Medicine 💉 timeline 👇 https://t.co/4PuhgUyJu3 Covid "vaccine" in UK is not approved, only been given temporary authorisation for 1 year👇 https://t.co/
@eiselcross @Frostymj1 @JuliaLBach8 @KateGrabowski @FDA UK approved or authorized pending more data? Pls provide the source. https://t.co/dKdKTAlnSq
RT @VerdiGg: “A temporary use authorisation is valid for one year only and requires the pharmaceutical companies to complete specific oblig…
RT @MarleyAMorris: Useful explainer on why Brexit is not really connected with UK early approval of Pfizer vaccine. The UK was still subje…
RT @jimmytheplant: EU. Vaccinating the UK: how the covid vaccine was approved, and other questions answered https://t.co/MTy9kbh3uu https:/…
EU. Vaccinating the UK: how the covid vaccine was approved, and other questions answered https://t.co/MTy9kbh3uu https://t.co/dSDMbuJkdl
Though some MPs have suggested that this approval process has been made possible only because the UK is leaving the European Union, Salisbury said that is not true. ...MHRA acted in line with EU regulations, and any other EU country could have done the sam
RT @MarleyAMorris: Useful explainer on why Brexit is not really connected with UK early approval of Pfizer vaccine. The UK was still subje…
RT @MarleyAMorris: Useful explainer on why Brexit is not really connected with UK early approval of Pfizer vaccine. The UK was still subje…
Useful explainer on why Brexit is not really connected with UK early approval of Pfizer vaccine. The UK was still subject to EU pharmaceutical law when it approved the vaccine. MHRA gave temporary authorisation before EMA approval, in line with EU law ht
@FabianZuleeg Also interesting how being in the transition period and still following EU rules may have helped the U.K. https://t.co/dpDd0Y3wFO
@ParisDaguerre Worth considering that MHRA was still operating under the EMA during the transition period and how that helped speed the approval process https://t.co/dpDd0Y3wFO
@fishySOX @Femi_Sorry anyway I'll leave this here https://t.co/ZM12yZqOeG
@SonJLB @Anselmus Ήταν απόφαση του MHRA να δώσει προσωρινή έγκριση , δεν έχει να κάνει με την εταιρία. Αναρωτιέμαι γιατί δεν έκανε το ίδιο κ η ΕΜΑ. Το αποτέλεσμα είναι τεσσερις βδομαδες καθυστέρηση https://t.co/36YDu8XiCH
@antsd1919 @DeborahMeaden Any EU member has the option to independently give emergency authorisation for a vaccine. The UK early action on the SARS-CoV2 vaccines was not a specific benefit of Brexit. https://t.co/vBm1TbzGMo
@kinch60 @mattuthompson I didn't imply "rushing". The UK used the temp mechanism to be used in case of emergency, whilst still under EU regulations (pre-2021), whereas the EU went for full EMA approval. (As far as I understand, there are more liability exe
@Alberto___x @Noname06401912 @yatesy9320 @pritipatel @FullFact Wait for approval? It’s not rocket science the EU commissions own statement at the time said the UK were moving too quickly https://t.co/J9jOAi3ljz
@nooouch @Applebear1976 @AlfMayall @GuidoFawkes “Quick! Get it before brexit kicks in”...who didn’t spot that? Now it’s their fault 🙄 https://t.co/nsSan7iCmz
@Martinpedalman @RobertCrossley2 @sean_antrim @BBCBreaking I believe out of all of these you are correct, MHRA were getting information as it became available and were effectively approving it as it went along with is different from normal submissions wher
@HimerMike @Card5hark @JimDOfficial @pritipatel Maybe you should actually read something educational then you might understand how and why the vaccine was approved gmail quickly and you’ll find nothing there relating to Brexit. https://t.co/H5iGzBsKq4
RT @Mami38796588: @x91K6ghSUoWCByv 人柱になって下さるの、ありがとうございます。 ノルウェーのコロナ死者=1/10,000人、ワクチン死者=33/33,000人ですね。確率的にはワクチンで亡くなる可能性の方が高いことになりますね。 また、ワ…
@chriskeebs @NJ_Timothy @Fox_Claire Surprised no member states followed the UK lead and opted out of the procurement strategy; emergency use authorisation was compliant with EU law back in December. Political though. https://t.co/40l2IYOgTc
@Davidwo35570144 @fi0namac @NJ_Timothy "Though some MPs have suggested that this approval process has been made possible only because the UK is leaving the European Union... The MHRA acted in line with EU regulations, and any other EU country could have do
@TMorecroft @helenopinion @BestForBritain @nevisondave ...no they haven't, but as I keep trying to explain, approval (and onward to vaccine roll out) is not a "benefit of brexit", that's the only point I'm making (see green bit in pic below) That said, I h
@Takru5 @Frusie @Claytoninhoo @StefanieBolzen @welt I will but here is some reading for you. https://t.co/k25DofmZar
@TMorecroft @helenopinion @BestForBritain @nevisondave https://t.co/gmV8eFTud3 BMJ version if you'd prefer it
@jamescolwill @solarcycles @Ali79596850 @sidmas88 @ProfKarolSikora It has been temporarily approved as allowed under emergency conditions. This from the BMJ feels balanced though the most alarming point is that the vaccine has not been tested for effects w
RT @Mami38796588: @MalusPumila4 @cocoroncoc 今のところ、感染拡大を抑制する効果は確認されていないようです。 https://t.co/2nQTgontZ2
@JaniceW78256134 @MandyInglis34 @AllisonBrown27 @ItsJustaRide I know you like to cherry pick from the BMJ, so here is a link from the BMJ - https://t.co/A9wzhJwx5U
RT @Mami38796588: @x91K6ghSUoWCByv マスコミにも惑わされず、ワクチンの人柱になってくださるご勇気に感謝しております🙌 たった10ヶ月で開発され、副作用の解明もされていないワクチンを打つ勇気は、私などではとても。。。😃
@DataWarrior1 @bearcat01 @BBCNews You're well aware of the truth - which is why you carefully use the phrase "didn't feel obliged" Truth is that our vaccine approvals were completely in line with EU rules and any member was entitled to do the same https:
@Tiki_taka888 @robfordmancs But yes, on balance probably not much difference: https://t.co/y8j4jAZv82 https://t.co/QQFcRG4Kex
@AwakeNowReady @Icanthinkformy2 @agcolehamilton @GeorgeFoulkes Just as well we are not giving it to animals then... Read this https://t.co/3CMYlpKlwh I am more than happy not to waste more time with you.
@acook95 @donnyc1975 @SteveBakerHW @BorisJohnson Here, its about the 5th heading down on a British Medical Journal Article "The MHRA acted in line with EU regulations, and any other EU country could have done the same, he said." This is because Uk was s
@Nintenmarz @Jeremy_Hunt "..some MPs have suggested that this approval process has been made possible only because the UK is leaving the European Union, ... is not true. The MHRA acted in line with EU regulations, and any other EU country could have done t
@Rabbaani786 I have to perform taqlīd - https://t.co/0YCjtuzncu
@LauraMayBennett @BMubaru @IainMulady @MadHatterGuide @PaulWilliamsLAB https://t.co/7tI25OsyiB this might help you...but might not, not too sure what you're looking for TBH
RT @jlk100: @scottbuller @naomirwolf Temporary authorisation was nothing to do with reducing safety requirements, it was an admin regulator…
@scottbuller @naomirwolf Temporary authorisation was nothing to do with reducing safety requirements, it was an admin regulatory workaround so didn’t have to wait for EMA to approve first, this screen shot and link is re Pfizer vaccine, but same applies r
@AkoshappyAkos @Mickey_Mayhew @JonJonesSnr The uk licensed the use of the vaccine first, that's all."Usually, the UK would wait for the European Medicines Agency to approve a vaccine....but in an emergency EU countries are allowed to use their own regulato
RT @Trikkynikky1: Vaccines have been authorised for one year only. These jabs are experimental. https://t.co/Jj00ql5if0
@ColinTKIrk @GraceBrodie Part of the reason is that each batch has to be tested given the emergency approvals given by the regulator. Unclear but this is probs the bottleneck This would not be the case with a new drug normally. BMJ explaining in reln to P
@AndrewBowie_MP Your letting him do it! Based on best practice Pfizer carried out the vaccine trials, with a 3 week gap. They evaluated and reported the results for peer revue. Submitted the findings for MHRA approval. Johnson thought of a number, https
Vaccines have been authorised for one year only. These jabs are experimental. https://t.co/Jj00ql5if0
@wheatgermdust @AlenaGermangirl @grantshapps Could have done that while in the EU https://t.co/V0Gep0ltTr
@marccardillo Hanno usato un processo burocratico di Rolling review, revisionando dati man mano che venivano comunicati. Il grosso però è arrivato il giorno prima che venisse approvato, quando è arrivato a EMA. https://t.co/JGZYSvRZDc
@MVSLGB @Fermi_sParadox @puffnblow_at_GP @JaneHeath01 @Piper_J @Snotsicle @GrimyMiner @paused123 @mac_puck @johnredwood @AndrewRosindell @mattfrei 2/ The MHRA acted in line with EU regulations, and any other EU country could have done the same, he said. f
@searchingfor81 @Fermi_sParadox @puffnblow_at_GP @JaneHeath01 @Piper_J @Snotsicle @GrimyMiner @paused123 @mac_puck @johnredwood @AndrewRosindell @mattfrei The question posed was “which medical authority approved the vaccine?” It was the British. The chang
@Fermi_sParadox @MVSLGB @puffnblow_at_GP @JaneHeath01 @Piper_J @Snotsicle @GrimyMiner @paused123 @mac_puck @johnredwood @AndrewRosindell @mattfrei a little bit of light reading for you dullard boy https://t.co/cG9V5wmFcL
@searchingfor81 @Fermi_sParadox @puffnblow_at_GP @JaneHeath01 @Piper_J @Snotsicle @GrimyMiner @paused123 @mac_puck @johnredwood @AndrewRosindell @mattfrei In October the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 to allow the MHRA to g
@PoliticalMusin4 @gaucherp @BBCBreakfast @BBCNews Is that really what happens or some delusion of yours? My understanding is any EU country can grant temporary emergency approval - which UK did as an EU country. The EMA needs to go faster, but the process
@TheDevi67687931 @Hogojohnnie1 @vonderleyen @Suewilson91 @pfizer The BMJ explains the process, as the UK is in the transition period, it was able to benefit from the European Medical Agency’s fast tracking of the COVID vaccine approval, and all EU countrie
@johndjasper @AngelaSpang @ciabaudo Sorry, not sure what you mean by new tech versions. You do know how the vaccine currently being used in the UK was approved so relatively quickly, I assume? https://t.co/L2CtH5OrOO
Park
RT @khalidkarim: https://t.co/H0LxH3kXtl Good read about vaccine approval process.Each country have their own. UK have only approved Pfiz…
RT @JSchmukler: 4/ ¿En qué se basó la MHRA para tomar esta decisión? Este artículo del BMJ lo explica bien, si lo quieren leer. Brevemente,…