The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 446 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
A focused protection vaccination strategy: why we should not target children with COVID-19 vaccination policies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2021-107700 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alberto Giubilini, Sunetra Gupta, Carl Heneghan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 52 | 12% |
| United States | 17 | 4% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Ireland | 4 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Comoros | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 4% |
| Unknown | 334 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 402 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 5% |
| Scientists | 14 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 26% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 347. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#98,963
of 26,378,208 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#28
of 3,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,919
of 455,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.