↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Cross-sectional exploration of the impact of the Dr Bawa-Garba case on doctors’ professional behaviours and attitudes towards the regulator

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Cross-sectional exploration of the impact of the Dr Bawa-Garba case on doctors’ professional behaviours and attitudes towards the regulator
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asta Medisauskaite, Henry Potts, Faye Gishen, Kirsty Alexander, Shah-Jalal Sarker, Ann Griffin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,889,441
of 21,875,616 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#5,815
of 21,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,894
of 341,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#225
of 928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,875,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.