| Title |
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.n2061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Skivington, Lynsay Matthews, Sharon Anne Simpson, Peter Craig, Janis Baird, Jane M Blazeby, Kathleen Anne Boyd, Neil Craig, David P French, Emma McIntosh, Mark Petticrew, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Martin White, Laurence Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 614 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 276 | 45% |
| Australia | 28 | 5% |
| Ireland | 19 | 3% |
| Canada | 18 | 3% |
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 10 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Finland | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Unknown | 199 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 266 | 43% |
| Scientists | 253 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 77 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2269 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 318 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 308 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 216 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 91 | 4% |
| Other | 89 | 4% |
| Other | 316 | 14% |
| Unknown | 931 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 326 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 315 | 14% |
| Psychology | 168 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 100 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 44 | 2% |
| Other | 293 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1023 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 436. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#66,582
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,142
of 65,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,943
of 438,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#46
of 773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.