↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
615 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1832 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2123 Mendeley
Title
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance
Published in
British Medical Journal, September 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmj.n2061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Skivington, Lynsay Matthews, Sharon Anne Simpson, Peter Craig, Janis Baird, Jane M Blazeby, Kathleen Anne Boyd, Neil Craig, David P French, Emma McIntosh, Mark Petticrew, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Martin White, Laurence Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 615 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 295 14%
Researcher 290 14%
Student > Master 209 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 91 4%
Other 79 4%
Other 329 15%
Unknown 830 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 309 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 289 14%
Psychology 156 7%
Social Sciences 98 5%
Sports and Recreations 40 2%
Other 310 15%
Unknown 921 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 438. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#64,500
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,128
of 64,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,912
of 435,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#47
of 773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.