The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053916 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline L Bender, Stephanie Babinski, Geoff Wong, Andrea C Tricco, Marina Englesakis, Alaina B Cyr, Henry Potts, Olga Perski, Mary Jane Esplen, Colleen Young, Richard Wassersug, Victoria Forster, Janet Papadakos, Charlene Soobiah, Colleen Fox, Alison Gothard-Huang, Holly Witteman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 16 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 16 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,595,793
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,963
of 26,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,670
of 450,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#138
of 898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.