↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 tweeters
Title
Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
Published in
BMJ Open, November 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053916
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline L Bender, Stephanie Babinski, Geoff Wong, Andrea C Tricco, Marina Englesakis, Alaina B Cyr, Henry Potts, Olga Perski, Mary Jane Esplen, Colleen Young, Richard Wassersug, Victoria Forster, Janet Papadakos, Charlene Soobiah, Colleen Fox, Alison Gothard-Huang, Holly Witteman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,705,598
of 19,496,717 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#3,560
of 18,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,929
of 326,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#48
of 422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,496,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.