| Title |
Predictors for efficacy of percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip system: the results of the MitraSwiss registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Sürder, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Oliver Gaemperli, Patric Biaggi, Christian Felix, Kaspar Rufibach, Christof auf der Maur, Raban Jeger, Peter Buser, Beat A Kaufmann, Marco Moccetti, David Hürlimann, Ines Bühler, Dominique Bettex, Jacques Scherman, Elena Pasotti, Francesco F Faletra, Michel Zuber, Tiziano Moccetti, Thomas F Lüscher, Paul Erne, Jürg Grünenfelder, Roberto Corti |
| Abstract |
Percutaneous mitral valve repair (MVR) using the MitraClip system has become a valid alternative for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high operative risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 59% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,256,330
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#1,619
of 5,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,555
of 280,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#14
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.