| Title |
Birth cohort trends in the global epidemiology of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in men and women: systematic review and metaregression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011827 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Slade, Cath Chapman, Wendy Swift, Katherine Keyes, Zoe Tonks, Maree Teesson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 40 | 29% |
| Australia | 17 | 12% |
| United States | 16 | 12% |
| Finland | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 61% |
| Scientists | 27 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 291 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 80 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 19% |
| Psychology | 43 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 100 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2391. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,383
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#6
of 25,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34
of 322,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#1
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.