↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 65,786)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort
Published in
British Medical Journal, September 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-071204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Debras, Eloi Chazelas, Laury Sellem, Raphaël Porcher, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Younes Esseddik, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Cédric Agaësse, Alexandre De Sa, Rebecca Lutchia, Léopold K Fezeu, Chantal Julia, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Benjamin Allès, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Inge Huybrechts, Bernard Srour, Mathilde Touvier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,531 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 5%
Student > Master 11 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 123 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 128 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4732. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#919
of 26,314,972 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#22
of 65,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33
of 438,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.