↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 65,250)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort
Published in
British Medical Journal, September 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-071204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Debras, Eloi Chazelas, Laury Sellem, Raphaël Porcher, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Younes Esseddik, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Cédric Agaësse, Alexandre De Sa, Rebecca Lutchia, Léopold K Fezeu, Chantal Julia, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Benjamin Allès, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Inge Huybrechts, Bernard Srour, Mathilde Touvier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,537 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 15 7%
Unspecified 12 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 113 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Unspecified 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 118 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4681. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#931
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#23
of 65,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34
of 435,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.