↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Very preterm/very low birthweight infants’ attachment: infant and maternal characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,054)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Very preterm/very low birthweight infants’ attachment: infant and maternal characteristics
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, June 2013
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dieter Wolke, Suna Eryigit-Madzwamuse, Tina Gutbrod

Abstract

To investigate whether there are differences in attachment security and disorganisation between very preterm or very low birthweight (VP/VLBW) (<32 weeks gestation or <1500 g birthweight) and full-term infants (37-42 weeks gestation) and whether the pathways to disorganised attachment differ between VP/VLBW and full-term infants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Master 30 18%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#785,088
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#49
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,057
of 209,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.