RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
As a former scientist who frequently complains about news stories TOTALLY misrepresenting/overstating the findings of studies, I'm finding this thread fascinating. https://t.co/04QxaiRLCa
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @maggiekb1: I did not know about this study until now. But this fits SO much anecdotal evidence from my time writing "new paper publishe…
Interesting research on the origin of exaggeration in science stories--it comes more from unis than from journalists. https://t.co/cmZolN8rpY
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77 2 years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the press releases issued by universities. https://t.co/5BvsFYj8vb Just process this for a moment. Lay write up of the stu
You mean scientists have something to sell? I am scandalised! https://t.co/RBhvMnVnhu
RT @ben_a_goldfarb: Indispensable thread in the “should scientists be allowed to check quotes” debate. Also a good reminder to regard pre…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
This thread! Applies to scientists and universities and PR and financial services and... Useful contribution to better #journalism and sharing #research outputs better, HT @chrisdc77. Applies to every #ESG study ever... https://t.co/hVsmmtKQPQ
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Indispensable thread in the “should scientists be allowed to check quotes” debate. Also a good reminder to regard press releases with a very healthy dose of skepticism. https://t.co/RDo85pNoWG
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
I did not know about this study until now. But this fits SO much anecdotal evidence from my time writing "new paper published" articles. https://t.co/RtDBJcBado
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @Clive_Bates: This thread on the sources of hype in science/health news reporting puts the blame on university press releases and public…
Ohhhh for f.... https://t.co/QrDITudXX5
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
@mikamckinnon See also: https://t.co/4xriQUu8GB
Interesting thread, and consistent w my experience when seeing press releases on overhyped studies. Working with your U's PR office, and having open access versions of paper to link to, can help. https://t.co/dXEKlDVHHD
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
@mikamckinnon One interesting facet here is the uni press releases as point of hype origin. Hopefully this would be something scientists would have more leverage over and wouldn’t require totally reevaluating journalistic ethics to address. https://t.co/p
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
Great thread https://t.co/8PkRLUbc1j
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Then we found the same pattern for press releases issued by major journals https://t.co/kcEDPCEHE5 and our results were also…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @pryorlisa: Good thread on media beat ups about scientific research, with this crucial point: the beat up often comes before journalists…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…