↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Strengthening global health security by embedding the International Health Regulations requirements into national health systems

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Global Health Journal, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
34 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Strengthening global health security by embedding the International Health Regulations requirements into national health systems
Published in
BMJ Global Health Journal, January 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Kluge, Jose Maria Martín-Moreno, Nedret Emiroglu, Guenael Rodier, Edward Kelley, Melitta Vujnovic, Govin Permanand

Abstract

The International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, as the overarching instrument for global health security, are designed to prevent and cope with major international public health threats. But poor implementation in countries hampers their effectiveness. In the wake of a number of major international health crises, such as the 2014 Ebola and 2016 Zika outbreaks, and the findings of a number of high-level assessments of the global response to these crises, it has become clear that there is a need for more joined-up thinking between health system strengthening activities and health security efforts for prevention, alert and response. WHO is working directly with its Member States to promote this approach, more specifically around how to better embed the IHR (2005) core capacities into the main health system functions. This paper looks at how and where the intersections between the IHR and the health system can be best leveraged towards developing greater health system resilience. This merging of approaches is a key component in pursuit of Universal Health Coverage and strengthened global health security as two mutually reinforcing agendas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 20%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 17 6%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 104 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 17%
Social Sciences 38 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 123 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,335,542
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#860
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,556
of 454,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#18
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.