↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Patient reported outcome measures in practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
Title
Patient reported outcome measures in practice
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g7818
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene C Nelson, Elena Eftimovska, Cristin Lind, Andreas Hager, John H Wasson, Staffan Lindblad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 439 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 17%
Researcher 76 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 15%
Other 41 9%
Student > Bachelor 41 9%
Other 98 22%
Unknown 48 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 13%
Psychology 25 6%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 2%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 82 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#348,345
of 15,355,386 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#4,771
of 48,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,194
of 289,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#176
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,355,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.