↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Patient reported outcome measures in practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
Title
Patient reported outcome measures in practice
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g7818
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene C Nelson, Elena Eftimovska, Cristin Lind, Andreas Hager, John H Wasson, Staffan Lindblad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 454 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 17%
Researcher 77 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 15%
Other 42 9%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Other 107 23%
Unknown 48 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 208 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 13%
Psychology 26 6%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 3%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 82 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#352,184
of 15,627,776 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#4,816
of 49,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,106
of 290,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#173
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,627,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.