↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Intestinal mucus affinity and biological activity of an orally administered antibacterial and anti-inflammatory peptide

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Intestinal mucus affinity and biological activity of an orally administered antibacterial and anti-inflammatory peptide
Published in
Gut, May 2014
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Dupont, Yani Kaconis, Ines Yang, Thorben Albers, Sabrina Woltemate, Lena Heinbockel, Mats Andersson, Sebastian Suerbaum, Klaus Brandenburg, Mathias W Hornef

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMP) provide protection from infection by pathogenic microorganisms and restrict bacterial growth at epithelial surfaces to maintain mucosal homeostasis. In addition, they exert a significant anti-inflammatory activity. Here we analysed the anatomical distribution and biological activity of an orally administered AMP in the context of bacterial infection and host-microbial homeostasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,805,023
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#5,528
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,040
of 227,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#51
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.