The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 993 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Is it time to start using the emoji in biomedical literature?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.k5033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vikas N O’Reilly-Shah, Grant C Lynde, Craig S Jabaley |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 177 | 18% |
| United States | 165 | 17% |
| Spain | 56 | 6% |
| Canada | 40 | 4% |
| Australia | 32 | 3% |
| France | 24 | 2% |
| Mexico | 19 | 2% |
| Ireland | 18 | 2% |
| Japan | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 134 | 13% |
| Unknown | 311 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 586 | 59% |
| Scientists | 186 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 182 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 38 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 742. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#29,115
of 26,793,597 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#616
of 66,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#498
of 449,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#14
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,793,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.