The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine Woolf, Hirosha Jayaweera, Emily Unwin, Karim Keshwani, Christopher Valerio, Henry Potts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 39% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 26% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#953,987
of 26,176,714 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,639
of 26,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,726
of 369,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#75
of 743 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 743 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.