↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates
Published in
BMJ Open, March 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Woolf, Hirosha Jayaweera, Emily Unwin, Karim Keshwani, Christopher Valerio, Henry Potts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 28%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#688,425
of 16,562,219 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,362
of 15,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,045
of 271,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#70
of 696 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,562,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 696 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.