↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates
Published in
BMJ Open, March 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Woolf, Hirosha Jayaweera, Emily Unwin, Karim Keshwani, Christopher Valerio, Henry Potts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Psychology 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 9 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#773,380
of 22,026,693 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,420
of 21,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,791
of 287,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#68
of 707 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,026,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 707 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.