↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Effect of sex on specialty training application outcomes: a longitudinal administrative data study of UK medical graduates
Published in
BMJ Open, March 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Woolf, Hirosha Jayaweera, Emily Unwin, Karim Keshwani, Christopher Valerio, Henry Potts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 27%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#614,867
of 15,621,847 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,238
of 14,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,196
of 268,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#66
of 696 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,621,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 696 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.