↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-a…

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
73 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data
Published in
British Medical Journal, June 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l1945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Haase, Peter Schlattmann, Pascal Gueret, Daniele Andreini, Gianluca Pontone, Hatem Alkadhi, Jörg Hausleiter, Mario J Garcia, Sebastian Leschka, Willem B Meijboom, Elke Zimmermann, Bernhard Gerber, U Joseph Schoepf, Abbas A Shabestari, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Matthijs F L Meijs, Akira Sato, Kristian A Ovrehus, Axel C P Diederichsen, Shona M M Jenkins, Juhani Knuuti, Ashraf Hamdan, Bjørn A Halvorsen, Vladimir Mendoza-Rodriguez, Carlos E Rochitte, Johannes Rixe, Yung Liang Wan, Christoph Langer, Nuno Bettencourt, Eugenio Martuscelli, Said Ghostine, Ronny R Buechel, Konstantin Nikolaou, Hans Mickley, Lin Yang, Zhaqoi Zhang, Marcus Y Chen, David A Halon, Matthias Rief, Kai Sun, Beatrice Hirt-Moch, Hiroyuki Niinuma, Roy P Marcus, Simone Muraglia, Réda Jakamy, Benjamin J Chow, Philipp A Kaufmann, Jean-Claude Tardif, Cesar Nomura, Klaus F Kofoed, Jean-Pierre Laissy, Armin Arbab-Zadeh, Kakuya Kitagawa, Roger Laham, Masahiro Jinzaki, John Hoe, Frank J Rybicki, Arthur Scholte, Narinder Paul, Swee Y Tan, Kunihiro Yoshioka, Robert Röhle, Georg M Schuetz, Sabine Schueler, Maria H Coenen, Viktoria Wieske, Stephan Achenbach, Matthew J Budoff, Michael Laule, David E Newby, Marc Dewey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 75 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 88 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#326,764
of 26,114,666 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,982
of 65,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,588
of 371,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#93
of 877 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,114,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 877 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.