↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

How much sugar is hidden in drinks marketed to children? A survey of fruit juices, juice drinks and smoothies

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
259 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
5 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
How much sugar is hidden in drinks marketed to children? A survey of fruit juices, juice drinks and smoothies
Published in
BMJ Open, March 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Boulton, Kawther M Hashem, Katharine H Jenner, Ffion Lloyd-Williams, Helen Bromley, Simon Capewell

Abstract

To investigate the amount of sugars in fruit juices, juice drinks and smoothies (FJJDS) marketed to children. We surveyed the sugars content (per 100 ml and standardised 200 ml portion) of all FJJDS sold by seven major UK supermarkets (supermarket own and branded products). Only products specifically marketed towards children were included. We excluded sports drinks, iced teas, sugar-sweetened carbonated drinks and cordials as being not specifically marketed towards children. We identified 203 fruit juices (n=21), juice drinks (n=158) and smoothies (n=24) marketed to children. Sugars content ranged from 0 to 16 g/100 ml. The mean sugars content was 7.0 g/100 ml, but among the 100% fruit juice category, it was 10.7 g/100 ml. Smoothies (13.0 g/100 ml) contained the highest amounts of sugars and juice drinks (5.6 g/100 ml) contained the lowest amount. 117 of the 203 FJJDS surveyed would receive a Food Standards Agency 'red' colour-coded label for sugars per standardised 200 ml serving. Only 63 FJJDS would receive a 'green' colour-coded label. 85 products contained at least 19 g of sugars-a child's entire maximum daily amount of sugars. 57 products contained sugar (sucrose), 65 contained non-caloric sweeteners and five contained both. Seven products contained glucose-fructose syrup. The sugars content in FJJDS marketed to children in the UK is unacceptably high. Manufacturers must stop adding unnecessary sugars and calories to their FJJDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 25%
Student > Master 34 21%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 12 7%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 686. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#31,163
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#75
of 25,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#527
of 315,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#3
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.