↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medication as initial glaucoma treatment: the glaucoma initial treatment study randomised clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medication as initial glaucoma treatment: the glaucoma initial treatment study randomised clinical trial
Published in
British Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2019
DOI 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghee Soon Ang, Eva K Fenwick, Marios Constantinou, Alfred Tau Liang Gan, Ryan Eyn Kidd Man, Robert J Casson, Eric A Finkelstein, Ivan Goldberg, Paul R Healey, Konrad Pesudovs, Sutha Sanmugasundram, Jing Xie, Rachel McIntosh, Jonathan Jackson, Anthony P Wells, Andrew White, Keith Martin, Mark J Walland, Jonathan G Crowston, Ecosse Luc Lamoureux

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 18%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 26 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,161,914
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#4,287
of 5,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,181
of 341,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#82
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.