The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medication as initial glaucoma treatment: the glaucoma initial treatment study randomised clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313396 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ghee Soon Ang, Eva K Fenwick, Marios Constantinou, Alfred Tau Liang Gan, Ryan Eyn Kidd Man, Robert J Casson, Eric A Finkelstein, Ivan Goldberg, Paul R Healey, Konrad Pesudovs, Sutha Sanmugasundram, Jing Xie, Rachel McIntosh, Jonathan Jackson, Anthony P Wells, Andrew White, Keith Martin, Mark J Walland, Jonathan G Crowston, Ecosse Luc Lamoureux |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,161,914
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#4,287
of 5,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,181
of 341,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#82
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.