↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Efficacy of antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes (the AIM study): double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
544 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes (the AIM study): double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre trial
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l5654
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Christian Haugli Bråten, Mads Peder Rolfsen, Ansgar Espeland, Monica Wigemyr, Jörg Aßmus, Anne Froholdt, Anne Julsrud Haugen, Gunn Hege Marchand, Per Martin Kristoffersen, Olav Lutro, Sigrun Randen, Maja Wilhelmsen, Bendik Slagsvold Winsvold, Thomas Istvan Kadar, Thor Einar Holmgard, Maria Dehli Vigeland, Nils Vetti, Øystein Petter Nygaard, Benedicte Alexandra Lie, Christian Hellum, Audny Anke, Margreth Grotle, Elina Iordanova Schistad, Jan Sture Skouen, Lars Grøvle, Jens Ivar Brox, John-Anker Zwart, Kjersti Storheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 544 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Master 18 10%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 68 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 78 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 379. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#82,958
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,358
of 64,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,623
of 369,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#35
of 866 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 866 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.