↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Effect of soy on faecal dry matter content and excretion of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Record Open, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Effect of soy on faecal dry matter content and excretion of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in pigs
Published in
Veterinary Record Open, May 2016
DOI 10.1136/vetreco-2015-000159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Grahofer, Gudrun Overesch, Heiko Nathues, Friederike Zeeh

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a soy diet on the excretion of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae in five farms with subclinically infected pigs. The effects on general health, faecal consistency and dry matter were analysed. In total, 200 pigs of different ages (group 1 <100 days of age (n=120) and group 2 ≥100 days (n=80)) were randomly assigned to the control (C) and the treatment (T) groups. Group C received the farm's standard diet. In group T half of the daily feed ration was replaced by pure soy on two consecutive days. Faecal scores were used to determine faecal consistency and a microwave method to assess faecal dry matter content (FDMC). In age group 1, soy feeding resulted in a statistically significant decrease of the FDMC of 2.5 per cent compared with group C and in age group 2 in a significant increase of 2.2 per cent compared with group C at day 2. Overall seven (T: 5, C: 2) out of 597 faecal samples tested positive for B hyodysenteriae by PCR. In conclusion, a high soy diet applied over two days influenced the faecal consistency and the FDMC in growers, finishers and sows under field conditions. Further investigations with more sensitive diagnostic methods are needed to prove a potential influence of a high soy diet on the detection rate of B hyodysenteriae in subclinically infected herds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 31%
Researcher 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Psychology 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Record Open
#87
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,015
of 312,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Record Open
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.