↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Reconsidering fetal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 3,242)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
886 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering fetal pain
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 886 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 12 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,906
of 20,026,391 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#4
of 3,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295
of 414,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,026,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.