↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Reconsidering fetal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 3,781)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
99 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
1533 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering fetal pain
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,533 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 42 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 43 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2024.
All research outputs
#4,194
of 26,794,081 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3
of 3,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 486,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.