↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Reconsidering fetal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 3,583)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
96 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
1511 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering fetal pain
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,511 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 36 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 38 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,890
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#4
of 3,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88
of 467,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.