The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,540 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Reconsidering fetal pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 293 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 2% |
| Spain | 26 | 2% |
| Mexico | 16 | 1% |
| Canada | 14 | <1% |
| Ireland | 12 | <1% |
| Brazil | 9 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 9 | <1% |
| Colombia | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 72 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1048 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1432 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 2% |
| Scientists | 32 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,139
of 26,378,208 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3
of 3,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 484,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,378,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.