↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Reconsidering fetal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 3,745)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
98 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
1541 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering fetal pain
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,541 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 39 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 40 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,120
of 26,315,660 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3
of 3,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 484,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,315,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 484,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.