↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Reconsidering fetal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 3,046)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
700 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Reconsidering fetal pain
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 700 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 5 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 807. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#11,825
of 17,489,168 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#6
of 3,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#520
of 393,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,489,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.