↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Reconsidering fetal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 2,747)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
621 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Reconsidering fetal pain
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105701
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart WG Derbyshire, John C Bockmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 621 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 691. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#11,865
of 15,432,447 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#5
of 2,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#575
of 344,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,432,447 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.