↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Improving researchers’ conflict of interest declarations

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Improving researchers’ conflict of interest declarations
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quinn Grundy, Adam G Dunn, Lisa Bero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Philosophy 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,029,121
of 23,917,011 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#10,989
of 61,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,953
of 366,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#364
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.