↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Improving researchers’ conflict of interest declarations

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Improving researchers’ conflict of interest declarations
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quinn Grundy, Adam G Dunn, Lisa Bero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#640,910
of 16,109,489 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#8,047
of 50,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,133
of 261,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#289
of 711 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,109,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 711 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.