| Title |
Financial ties between leaders of influential US professional medical associations and industry: cross sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m1505 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ray Moynihan, Loai Albarqouni, Conrad Nangla, Adam G Dunn, Joel Lexchin, Lisa Bero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,345 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 162 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 80 | 6% |
| France | 76 | 6% |
| Canada | 48 | 4% |
| Australia | 29 | 2% |
| Spain | 28 | 2% |
| Colombia | 24 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 13 | <1% |
| Ireland | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 102 | 8% |
| Unknown | 775 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1109 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 127 | 9% |
| Scientists | 83 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1021. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,944
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#400
of 65,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#794
of 431,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#19
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.