| Title |
Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m2195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min Liu, Shou-Zhen Cheng, Ke-Wei Xu, Yang Yang, Qing-Tang Zhu, Hui Zhang, Da-Ya Yang, Shu-Yuan Cheng, Han Xiao, Ji-Wen Wang, He-Rui Yao, Yu-Tian Cong, Yu-Qi Zhou, Sui Peng, Ming Kuang, Fan-Fan Hou, K K Cheng, Hai-Peng Xiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,539 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 222 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 187 | 12% |
| United States | 96 | 6% |
| Japan | 41 | 3% |
| Australia | 37 | 2% |
| Spain | 23 | 1% |
| Canada | 17 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 15 | <1% |
| India | 13 | <1% |
| Other | 148 | 10% |
| Unknown | 740 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1252 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 167 | 11% |
| Scientists | 100 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 517 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 14% |
| Researcher | 56 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 11% |
| Other | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 90 | 17% |
| Unknown | 179 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 141 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 73 | 14% |
| Unknown | 191 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1052. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,277
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#379
of 65,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#772
of 435,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#17
of 876 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 876 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.