↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1671 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study
Published in
British Medical Journal, June 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m2195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Liu, Shou-Zhen Cheng, Ke-Wei Xu, Yang, Qing-Tang Zhu, Hui Zhang, Da-Ya Yang, Shu-Yuan Cheng, Han Xiao, Ji-Wen Wang, He-Rui Yao, Yu-Tian Cong, Yu-Qi Zhou, Sui Peng, Ming Kuang, Fan-Fan Hou, KK Cheng, Hai-Peng Xiao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,671 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Other 27 12%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 53 24%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 57 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,460
of 16,338,485 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#162
of 50,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#462
of 290,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#15
of 709 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,338,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 709 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.