Reference: https://t.co/J00Cf04Zlv.
@JlsRet51206 @Tsarorius Je vous conseille plutôt ça comme méta par exemple. Réalisée par des dizaines d'experts, publiée dans une revue prestigieuse et relue par leurs pairs. https://t.co/rOrqJeVgFu
@JeremyFoub @pia_mapia @lonnibesancon @Beatrice_Rosen @MamansLouves Le BMJ par exemple a fait un boulot énorme la dessus, une méta énorme pour analyser les différents traitements. Plus de 300 études prisent en compte, une méthodologie propre, et mis à jour
RT @raoult_didier: Le BMJ publie une meta-analyse sur les traitements testés dans des études randomisées et montre que parmi les molécules…
@mongoosenewyork @MdBreathe @Craig_A_Spencer Oh yeah I found a few, including a meta-analysis thanks https://t.co/KW0WwqEqv4 https://t.co/BH7yqezZlL https://t.co/kw2BA5QO75
@Valenti88688688 @manuelaiati Dalla stessa ricerca (https://t.co/AxUQLTl69d) risulta efficace per ridurre la mortalità (obiettivo principale all'epoca) l'uso dei corticosteroidi e glucocorticoidi anche in associazione con inibitori dei recettori dell'IL6 (
@Nothing73144852 @bmj_latest @munkeatlooi They dont. See https://t.co/zyUPSBZuTJ
@ShreerajT @anujtiwari11 Similar data for antivirals in COVID… https://t.co/dqdKbTakBX
@derechabrasil @Belzebu___666 Vamos fazer você pensar, já que cobra isso de mim: https://t.co/75yUjWWHgA isso é a meta análise do Britain Medical Journal sobre drogas usadas como tratamento pra covid 19. Veja aí a conclusão pra ivermectina
No treatments? EUA my arse! Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis | The BMJ https://t.co/SH6whHg5Ns
@insins31544458 @sudokuvariante @TPMP @olivierveran Car à l'inverse, je viens de faire une recherche rapide (simplement google avec 'study invermectin covid'), Exemple d'études publiées (et relues) dans les revues les plus sérieuses. ;) https://t.co/1RADoZ
@lavenderroute @GustavoMalfi @monark Já que me mandou ler, eu fui. Encontrei a revisão sistemática da British Medical Journey: https://t.co/75yUjWWHgA esse seu site, c19early, é da mesma família do c19study e do hcqmeta, o primeiro saiu do ar após denúncia
RT @SocDoneLeft: @TedNugent That's cool. When will you use your massive platform to highlight the BMJ's living systematic review of eviden…
@TedNugent That's cool. When will you use your massive platform to highlight the BMJ's living systematic review of evidence for COVID treatments, which suggests that ivermectin is no better than standard care -- ie, no better than a placebo injection? ht
RT @SocDoneLeft: The report also claimed that Ivermectin does fight COVID. In reality, the BMJ's living systematic review of evidence for…
RT @SocDoneLeft: The report also claimed that Ivermectin does fight COVID. In reality, the BMJ's living systematic review of evidence for…
RT @SocDoneLeft: The report also claimed that Ivermectin does fight COVID. In reality, the BMJ's living systematic review of evidence for…
The report also claimed that Ivermectin does fight COVID. In reality, the BMJ's living systematic review of evidence for COVID treatments suggests that ivermectin is no better than standard care -- ie, no better than a placebo injection. https://t.co/5rCT
@will_s_t @bmj_latest @bmj_company YOUR WORK IS AMAZING! What about those graphs on the COVID Rx NMA paper? Jaw-dropping https://t.co/s2IDdvG747 https://t.co/eCtcgmPQtF
RT @elboghdadly: This concept of a living systematic review and network meta-analysis is both clever and informative. Perhaps this should b…
@giz53410600 @barbarab1974 Certo come no…. https://t.co/kTwBezUxvq https://t.co/TMwvcMexym
@TontonChristob2 @funnyvalle @obourdais @PouetToima @hervemaison Mais même si les chiffres sur l'HCQ en comparaison au groupe contrôle étaient assez fantaisistes, d'autres méta-analyses plus sérieuses ont bien démontré que le traitement pouvait avoir un ef
@lisa_berau @JulienPain Si tu veux le lien, le lien ! LE LIEN ! Voilà une étude de juillet 2020 qui ne trouve aucun bénéfice à l'hydroxymachin mais qui constate qu'il augmente les risques d'effets secondaires néfastes. https://t.co/wPeuJZ7Z01
@Beatrice_Rosen @JulienPain Je doute que tu t'intéresse VRAIMENT à la question mais il est acquis depuis au moins le 30 juillet 2020 (date de publication de cette étude) que l'hydroxymachin ne montre pas de bénéfices, mais augmente les risques d'effets sec
RT @CCispec: Este estudio es una revisión sistemática viva y metaanálisis en red que compara los efectos de los tratamientos farmacológicos…
Este estudio es una revisión sistemática viva y metaanálisis en red que compara los efectos de los tratamientos farmacológicos utilizados para covid-19 como la mortalidad y el uso de ventilación mecánica entre otros. Más sobre este #estudio: https://t.co
RT @RevistaMFSamfyc: Tratamientos farmacológicos para covid-19: revisión sistemática viva y metaanálisis en red https://t.co/ZTFA3ZJJbj PMI…
Tratamientos farmacológicos para covid-19: revisión sistemática viva y metaanálisis en red https://t.co/ZTFA3ZJJbj PMID 32732190
@UToc2Me @arriettydubronx @mmtchi Non, soyons un peu sérieux quand même, je vous conseille plutôt les véritables méta. Publiées et relues par ses pairs, et qui sur l'HCQ font largement consensus. https://t.co/BfgVa5inXQ https://t.co/0G0vk7L6Hq https://t.co
Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis https://t.co/NoVBURRfMM
RT @HAS_veille: Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis | The BMJ https://t.co/tWonbc40SE
Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis | The BMJ https://t.co/tWonbc40SE
@PhilippeRainant @arriettydubronx @Isabel723277471 Non. Le consensus scientifique est largement établi sur le sujet, avec des meta-analyses sérieuses. https://t.co/M9CRCXZOsS https://t.co/1RADoZ2GoZ https://t.co/5a7MvjjQnC https://t.co/jS2Hv5K53R
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
@Ben0865 @philippeherlin Ah ? Car concrètement, il existe une méta-analyse sérieuse qui tend à penser que ces traitements sont efficaces ? Perso je n'en ai pas trouvé, donc oui, le consensus est clair et Youtube peut s'y fier. ;) https://t.co/9FB5yARPoW ht
@FrankM009 @raoult_didier Ou alors c'est juste basé sur un tas de données scientifiques (méta analyses, etc.) qui font largement consensus sur le sujet. On sait que ces traitements sont inefficaces. https://t.co/BfgVa5inXQ https://t.co/jS2Hv5K53R https://t
@NuageRouge20 @von_damien @raoult_didier Ah ? Donc les méta analyses sérieuses de ce genre là : https://t.co/jS2Hv5K53R C'est aussi BFM qui les fait c'est ça? ^^ Sérieusement, rapporter ça aux médias est idiot, on a des tas de données scientifiques solides
RT @leticiakawano: Please meet @RSiemieniuk and @rominabrigpet , amazing methodologists from @HEI_mcmaster leading the superb project of li…
RT @leticiakawano: #MAGICsummit Prof @rominabrigpet talks about the living network meta-analysis on drug treatments of COVID-19 Daily data…
#MAGICsummit Prof @rominabrigpet talks about the living network meta-analysis on drug treatments of COVID-19 Daily data monitoring/screening to make sure evidence synthesis (data analysis) is updated when needed This is a huge amount of work (it's been a
Please meet @RSiemieniuk and @rominabrigpet , amazing methodologists from @HEI_mcmaster leading the superb project of living systematic review on drug treatments for COVID-19 (among other relevant works): https://t.co/s2IDdvXIsH At #MAGICsummit #MOTTIRL
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
BTW we also utilized data from the fantastic COVID-19 living review published in the @bmj_latest https://t.co/e64wfxLptB 7/12
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
RT @hkakeya: 実際には差があっても、標本数が少ないと「統計的有意差がない」は状態は起こる。前も紹介したがBMJではアビガンは一部有意差のある良好な結果が出ている。レムデシビルとイベルメクチンは出ていない。だが、レムデシビルの認可と使用を批判する人を見ない。 http…
RT @CritCareUpdate: Dr. Bram Rochwerg's (@Bram_Rochwerg) pearls from "Evidence-based COVID treatments" 1. Compiling evidence is no easy fe…
Dr. Bram Rochwerg's (@Bram_Rochwerg) pearls from "Evidence-based COVID treatments" 1. Compiling evidence is no easy feat: Continually adding to ""living guidelines"", found in the BMJ (https://t.co/sucYln9MBB; Siemieniuk et al., 2020)
@pe18_rose @Armiansk1 @Asgaard_kingdom @raoult_didier Efficace ? D'après le fort consensus scientifique, absolument pas. https://t.co/0G0vk7L6Hq https://t.co/BfgVa5inXQ https://t.co/jS2Hv5K53R
Que répondez-vous à cela @EricChabriere2 ?
RT @Florentgen: @DollyBig Quels sources ? Les méta analyse sont claires, aucune efficacité. Et en médecine, un témoignage, c'est le niveau…
@DollyBig Quels sources ? Les méta analyse sont claires, aucune efficacité. Et en médecine, un témoignage, c'est le niveau 0 de la preuve scientifique... ;) https://t.co/BfgVa5iVNo https://t.co/jS2Hv5KCTp https://t.co/0G0vk7LEwY
สำหรับเพื่อนแพทย์หรือบุคคลที่สนใจ ว่าตอนนี้มียาอะไรที่โลกนี้เค้าใช้กันบ้าง ลองดู living systematic review จาก BMJ ได้ค่ะ https://t.co/8QFD2Dtzh7
@jay_fim @Simeon39152961 @Jujusese13 HCQ n'est pas toxique, juste pas anodin comme n'importe quel médicament, et vu qu'à coté de ça il est inefficace (clairement prouvé par méta), la balance bénéfice/risque est en effet négative oui. https://t.co/0G0vk7L6H
@CarneDeTwit @CharlotteD_04 @AurelieM0813 Et pour finir, ce n'est pas cette étude qui a permis de conclure à l'inefficacité de l'hydroxichloroquine, mais plusieurs méta-analyses sérieuses qui nous l'indique : https://t.co/Rzf3LsVzYh https://t.co/jS2Hv5K53
@pondera_fm @AesBrah @Johnincarlisle @drbeen_medical Re: "Bmj classifies" BMJ didn't classify. A hallmark of you non-expert conspiracists is an inability to distinguish a journal from authors publishing in that journal. 🙄 It was last updated in April 20
RT @ArnavAgarwalMD: Associated guideline in the @WHO portal: https://t.co/PUB1cYDFCN Associated guideline in @theMAGICapp: https://t.co/1K…
RT @ArnavAgarwalMD: Associated guideline in the @WHO portal: https://t.co/PUB1cYDFCN Associated guideline in @theMAGICapp: https://t.co/1K…
Associated guideline in the @WHO portal: https://t.co/PUB1cYDFCN Associated guideline in @theMAGICapp: https://t.co/1K2f9M2WkB Associated LNMA: https://t.co/2YCCLHU6oO https://t.co/BerlASx3j5
@the_skrat @LiberteFran @mompontet Parce que les traitements en question NE FONCTIONNENT PAS ! Arrêtez de croire votre daube complotiste ! Lisez de la vraie science, et notamment les méta-analyses, dont : https://t.co/iGmPELhLes OU https://t.co/B3gco8s3Ns
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
@BretWeinstein @micsolana A lot of the discussions about Ivermectin seem to do exactly that. When you really dig into the detail the picture is not nearly that simple. Particularly for people actually treating patients where it is a matter of life or d
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
@Zenon71647295 @giranthon @Christi67158123 Meta analyses HCQ 15/15 https://t.co/RxownsqUgn https://t.co/Bfq56Oe5vx https://t.co/ZehN3brF4j
RT @drumz3606: None of the studies on hospitalized patients are valid. Even our own DaoD in their secret FOIA’d papers say HCQ MIST be used…
RT @drumz3606: None of the studies on hospitalized patients are valid. Even our own DaoD in their secret FOIA’d papers say HCQ MIST be used…
None of the studies on hospitalized patients are valid. Even our own DaoD in their secret FOIA’d papers say HCQ MIST be used preventatively or within about 24-36 hrs of Covid onset. (Try harder…). https://t.co/O66uegDORD
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…
RT @grahamwalker: Several reviews/studies: https://t.co/3zw3S4Ssup https://t.co/i1ru4xRpKJ https://t.co/s9cQbLm3O0 Here's one from Brazil…