The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Unsafe sax: cohort study of the impact of too much sax on the mortality of famous jazz musicians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, December 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.319.7225.1612 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanjay Kinra, Mona Okasha |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Finland | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Russia | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 75% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 29% |
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#900,971
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#9,386
of 64,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#861
of 111,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#16
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.