RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
RT @0waki: 話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
話題に出た、科学ニュースの誇張の多くは大学のプレスリリースに由来するという論文はこれ。https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe
Popular journalism has a tendency to misrepresent scientific research. It turns out, the source of this in many cases is press releases written about scientific papers from e.g. university press offices! https://t.co/Uv5eEXm31K #EMNLP2021 #NLProc
RT @jgitchell: This tweet *may* be an example of the phenomenon reported in this 2014 @bmj_latest article: https://t.co/EdZfGll5Qm
RT @jgitchell: This tweet *may* be an example of the phenomenon reported in this 2014 @bmj_latest article: https://t.co/EdZfGll5Qm
RT @jgitchell: This tweet *may* be an example of the phenomenon reported in this 2014 @bmj_latest article: https://t.co/EdZfGll5Qm
RT @jgitchell: This tweet *may* be an example of the phenomenon reported in this 2014 @bmj_latest article: https://t.co/EdZfGll5Qm
RT @jgitchell: This tweet *may* be an example of the phenomenon reported in this 2014 @bmj_latest article: https://t.co/EdZfGll5Qm https:/…
This tweet *may* be an example of the phenomenon reported in this 2014 @bmj_latest article: https://t.co/EdZfGll5Qm
RT @pash22: Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases: Improving the accuracy of academic press relea…
Exaggeration in news is strongly associated with exaggeration in press releases: Improving the accuracy of academic press releases could represent a key opportunity for reducing misleading health related news. https://t.co/LSbeOLglvl via @chrisdc77 et al
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study https://t.co/MVpb4eQ5d1
@Tuffmann @videnskabdk @PFlojstrup @madsnyvold @JonathanTybjerg @AsgerSkovdal @Mads_Sejer @StigRgaard @madskjaer @HenningKA_DK @VidPeter Super gode råd. Et 12. råd kunne måske være at undgå at basere historien alene på en pressemeddelelse. Abstract'et har
O irônico é q, boa parte dos exageros da imprensa na cobertura de notícias ligadas às ciências, começa no próprio press release das instituições e grupos de pesquisa. https://t.co/HgmONK46eU
Not even joking. Journalists sometimes don’t do a very good job of critically reporting science, but a large proportion of the exaggeration of (esp. medical) research happens at the university press office. https://t.co/vw5178nJhW
@CaulfieldTim So this is nothing new, Tim. We've been talking about this for decades - https://t.co/oAY5ujupsH
@avaltd @CallumJCParr @hildabast @WIRED I can't disagree with any of your comments re press releases & the media - this is a common problem*...! ...however, Hilda was working largely from the primary documents (protocol &c) & simply applying m
@fselsis @MicroJustyna Here is my information from: https://t.co/kYaHVQuqNQ
@theresphysics @xr_cambridge Yes exactly. Studies have show that university press releases tend to overhype health studies 😞 https://t.co/BPaKMl6v78 And https://t.co/pV1zfmVHQY
RT @cragcrest: Of course there are good scientists doing rigorous work, but there are many who do not. The hype rarely originates with jour…
Of course there are good scientists doing rigorous work, but there are many who do not. The hype rarely originates with journalists. See: https://t.co/mLNOkSiYNt
RT @opinionatedqs: Fascinating and eye-opening looking at the importance of accurate reporting of diagnosis/prognosis in the #PDoCMediaWatc…
RT @opinionatedqs: Fascinating and eye-opening looking at the importance of accurate reporting of diagnosis/prognosis in the #PDoCMediaWatc…
RT @JennyKitzinger: Revisiting this key 2014 study of press releases for our #PDoCMediaWatch online course. 40% of press releases containe…
RT @opinionatedqs: Fascinating and eye-opening looking at the importance of accurate reporting of diagnosis/prognosis in the #PDoCMediaWatc…
Fascinating and eye-opening looking at the importance of accurate reporting of diagnosis/prognosis in the #PDoCMediaWatch online course, how that reporting affects family/relatives of patients
RT @JennyKitzinger: Revisiting this key 2014 study of press releases for our #PDoCMediaWatch online course. 40% of press releases containe…
Revisiting this key 2014 study of press releases for our #PDoCMediaWatch online course. 40% of press releases contained exaggerated advice, 33% exaggerated causal claims, 36% exaggerated inference to humans from animal research. Have things changed? h
@richardabetts ie. all sciences may have this problem? cli-sci may have a particularly bad case (impact papers?) https://t.co/kcT5YQmz6P
@gabrielacaesar @lmonasterio @renanrotorres Esse é um problema mais do que comum, infelizmente https://t.co/EO6PlYyA61
Yet only few empirical #studies have analyzed this alleged influence of #PR on (#science) #journalism with elaborate input/output research designs. The fe wthat do - like the great Sumner et al (https://t.co/NRzcJuTscM) - focus on selected topics & don
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
imagine a world with so many, too many, opportunistic research that go public before a proper, rigorous peer-review process. boom! this is the reality that we are living in now!
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
RT @RVAwonk: Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example,…
Some scientists contribute to the problem, too, by overstating or oversimplifying their findings. This BMJ study, for example, found that press releases accompanying health-related studies often have inaccuracies that may lead to misleading news coverage.
RT @0waki: この論文がもっと読まれてほしい。 https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe メディアでおおげさな話が出回る原因は大学のプレスリリースだったという話。
RT @0waki: この論文がもっと読まれてほしい。 https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe メディアでおおげさな話が出回る原因は大学のプレスリリースだったという話。
この論文がもっと読まれてほしい。 https://t.co/QcuZeVAhwe メディアでおおげさな話が出回る原因は大学のプレスリリースだったという話。
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study https://t.co/lxyk15v34C
@heidirgardner @shauntreweek @beagoulao this is interesting in the context of public understanding of trials, and trial methodology, especially now and in the near future as more covid-19 trials are published.
@JHolmesSheff @laurahowe_epi @BBCNews That's certainly true too, e.g. https://t.co/XNqwWxsLBv
@thuyvytnguyen @siminevazire @RogertheGS @dstephenlindsay @RegReports This moves us to a different, more lawless land Education is key, making clear to all stakeholders that hyped press releases are NOT associated with greater news uptake Forgive the sel
RT @ryomakom: 医療がらみのニュースに、「XXすると長生きします」的な、行き過ぎた表現がみられるのはなぜか? 記者が勝手に妙なことを書いてるのではなく、研究機関の側が、論文には書かなかった誇大表現をメディア向けプレスリリースに盛り込んでいるケースが多いらしい、という…
RT @ryomakom: 医療がらみのニュースに、「XXすると長生きします」的な、行き過ぎた表現がみられるのはなぜか? 記者が勝手に妙なことを書いてるのではなく、研究機関の側が、論文には書かなかった誇大表現をメディア向けプレスリリースに盛り込んでいるケースが多いらしい、という…
医療がらみのニュースに、「XXすると長生きします」的な、行き過ぎた表現がみられるのはなぜか? 記者が勝手に妙なことを書いてるのではなく、研究機関の側が、論文には書かなかった誇大表現をメディア向けプレスリリースに盛り込んでいるケースが多いらしい、という研究。 https://t.co/dZTxXQ8zBE
'When press releases contained such exaggeration, 58%, 81%, and 86% of news stories, respectively, contained similar exaggeration, compared with exaggeration rates of 17%, 18%, and 10% in news when the press releases were not exaggerated.' https://t.co/Jv
RT @mspitschan: @BrownlabV This article quite relevant: https://t.co/miScRM9uKx
@BrownlabV This article quite relevant: https://t.co/miScRM9uKx
RT @HarrietHopfMD: @DrvanTilburg Flip of argument would improve literature: Men in science are allowed to hype findings & draw unwarranted…
@DrvanTilburg Flip of argument would improve literature: Men in science are allowed to hype findings & draw unwarranted conclusions➡️harm. https://t.co/5X8kUmYipG (🚺caveat: gender not reported in study, so extrapolation, not data-based conclusion). #Ma
@meganranney @reshmajagsi @JulieSilverMD Remember: exaggerating results is something BMJ has identified as a problem in medical publishing https://t.co/5X8kUmYipG 🤔
RT @chrisdc77: @jamesheathers @jon_y_huang @NoahHaber @ashtroid22 Here you go, a selection of work by ourselves and others on this 1 https:…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @jon_y_huang: 🤔🤔🤔 Curious where exaggerated claims about research findings come from? Is it the paper, the press release, the news stor…
RT @jon_y_huang: 🤔🤔🤔 Curious where exaggerated claims about research findings come from? Is it the paper, the press release, the news stor…
🤔🤔🤔 Curious where exaggerated claims about research findings come from? Is it the paper, the press release, the news story? A curated list of empirical studies awaits! 👀👀👀 #epitwitter #statstwitter
@jamesheathers @jon_y_huang @NoahHaber @ashtroid22 Here you go, a selection of work by ourselves and others on this 1 https://t.co/bidQRQmagn 2 https://t.co/hCeHOqfBDv 3 https://t.co/kFii3wgT45 4 https://t.co/JH3CmPIwxv 5 https://t.co/QVkiQooRU0 6 https://
@philbert @MilfjeMeulskens @ionicasmeets Dat was dit hier, lijkt me: https://t.co/TFAWXPX8zz. En dit zou het Engelse onderzoek kunnen zijn waarvan de Nederlandse studie een replicatie is: https://t.co/yptwhsnZK7. Petroc Sumner doet hier trouwens nog steeds
@neurojojo University PR depts play a big role, too: https://t.co/SnJM0ADWGm Not that this excuses journalists...
Disturbing
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: To recap tweet 14/x above, in Dec 2014 we published a retrospective study which found that most exaggeration found in health…
RT @chrisdc77: Neat replication in the Netherlands of our finding that most exaggeration in UK sci/health news is already present in press…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
RT @chrisdc77: Two years later the 1st results were in & they were striking: most exaggeration in science/health news was already in the pr…
@rasmansa @gimblerocket @delphi_ote Sadly I don’t think that’s accurate. The papers themselves often contain exaggeration, and the exaggeration in the news seems to come largely from exaggeration in academic press releases which authors often have a hand i
@asaplsnr @eturnermd1 -> Det går inte att utgå från publicerade studier och bara sammanväga dem. Man måste granska avgörande studierna enskilt och t ex bedöma risken för publikationsbias. Här syndar många - inte minst universitet i pressmeddelanden so