@bosley_rich Here’s a paper from the Journal of Medical Ethics where it’s being argued that post-birth abortion should be allowed in all cases. https://t.co/P726Ow1MgK
RT @3TonyStark3: @caringguy1957 @GVergenvrac @bosley_rich It’s been around a long time.. feminists even advocated for it up to 5 years old.…
This is reprehensible. 🤬
@caringguy1957 @GVergenvrac @bosley_rich It’s been around a long time.. feminists even advocated for it up to 5 years old. https://t.co/pqH60Hbvqb
@bosley_rich It been an advocacy of feminists for a long time.. where have you been? https://t.co/pqH60Hbvqb
@JReinerMD I don’t know Jonathan. There is a movement in medical ethics to extend abortion beyond birth. Policy needs to stop this ethical creep! https://t.co/IIWAhyMwcH
@bosley_rich Here's another for you: https://t.co/HNM8vehu00
@bosley_rich Read these articles that I quickly found that show what she is talking about https://t.co/CGEkQ65Ea8 https://t.co/DXIxF9lyx3 https://t.co/HNPHLGswuB https://t.co/0fV4hDEbiE
@Mare_Argent @LarsSivertsvik @StianAmadeus Alt kommer før eller siden til Norge. https://t.co/mrhxDXmqSV
@RickChapterTwo @bosley_rich They're referring to after-birth abortion, which started gaining steam 12 years ago as an argument from extreme pro-choicers using an article in the BMJ. Pro-lifers call it partial birth abortion, but that's not a real term. ht
RT @realTrumpDucky: @TojaBeth @RickChapterTwo @bosley_rich Quack Some academics seem to be calling for this. https://t.co/XEbMaoruiU
@bosley_rich They were discussing this way back in 2013 - and the push for no restrictions whatsoever by democrats is well known https://t.co/Po8ErAStyh
@bosley_rich Article in the Journal of Medical Ethics argues that a fetus & a newborn have the same moral value (none) & that the same arguments used to justify a late-term abortion also applies to killing a newborn (post-birth abortion. https://t
@TojaBeth @RickChapterTwo @bosley_rich Quack Some academics seem to be calling for this. https://t.co/XEbMaoruiU
@NonplussedNana @DrCalumMiller @Shareaholic After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/35TLtrqqIM
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/35TLtrqqIM
@mob64659607 @doisdedosdeteo Tem um artigo sobre isso, talvez vc concorde. https://t.co/skR85ipuK4 Eu discordar, não quer dizer que vc tem que discordar e nem que é falso. Talvez vc devesse ser um pouco mais curioso
@radusorinca @DEXVirus nu el a inventat conceptul, ci doar se da extra edgy cu el https://t.co/6eejKdIkRC
@RacismoFree13 @MedicoLiberdade é isso aqui https://t.co/vHXFVTzQvl
@Parechalpetain4 @TowaYowaIowa Y'en a même qui argumentent qu'on devrait pouvoir APRÈS la naissance mdr https://t.co/SeQ7Er7GgR
@AxelJimet @TowaYowaIowa "Ok mais un bébé n'est pas vraiment différent d'un fœtus alors on devrait pouvoir le faire même après la naissance" https://t.co/SeQ7Er7GgR
@nhgrown Isn't he talking about the 7 states that have no restriction at all? I know a lot of people were using this somewhat dated journal piece. No idea if anyone passed any law one way or the other. https://t.co/WRwHCE2NOR
@shadyboho @raccoon_1 @sdrace928 @DLMILTON @JoJoFromJerz “authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.” https://t.co
@Emerald37227481 @ArinMyths "Nobody wants that." Ever heard of Peter Singer? Also: https://t.co/97YhSKgsBp
@DukOie @DoctoMaster @Melanie_Vogel_ https://t.co/uPFJ5Flz15 Lis ça, tu verras que des scientifiques montre qu’il n’y a pas de raison de refuser un avortements à quelques jours de vie. C’est la porte ouverte aux dérives
@threeamprayer @MaryLouGrier1 @DrCalumMiller This has been argued for over a decade. Peter Singer of Princeton has argued that an adult pig has more moral worth than a newborn human baby. https://t.co/KJf2Gt8LOc
@eyeslasho @TerranceJones80 Viable but not survivable. Very interesting article I read a long time ago. https://t.co/mWelIPkdrI I have my opinions but I enjoying being the devil's advocate as well.
@TerranceJones80 @eyeslasho These academics, who support abortion, do believe the logic for permitting abortion similarly permits infanticide. Not sure that would go over too well with most people outside academia . . . . https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf https://
@Vermeullarmine The inexorable logic of the Left . . . . https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf https://t.co/BEL3iPXwjB
@KochanyPrezio @barbaraanowacka Niektóre kręgi zachodnie, bardziej postępowe niż nasza zacofana lewica stawiają ważne i potrzebne pytanie: niby dlaczego noworodek ma mieć prawo do życia? Po odsunięciu od władzy obecnej pseudo lewicy zaczniemy wreszcie praw
@citizenjournos_ 2011 - 2 Italian academics published a paper in the BMJ promoting after-birth abortions because newly born babies aren't actually human yet! Some American state wanted to bring it in so a mother who killed her child up to 3 months wouldnt
@batatalal Many philosophers, journalists, and activists call for the right to have post-birth abortions as well. https://t.co/3eD4y94jeX
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
If premature babies are full people, what are incubators for?
RT @Thisisa74798027: Make no mistake. Pro-aborts will not stop at 15 weeks. They will not stop at 20 weeks, 24 week, 28 weeks, 36 weeks, o…
RT @Thisisa74798027: Make no mistake. Pro-aborts will not stop at 15 weeks. They will not stop at 20 weeks, 24 week, 28 weeks, 36 weeks, o…
Make no mistake. Pro-aborts will not stop at 15 weeks. They will not stop at 20 weeks, 24 week, 28 weeks, 36 weeks, or even 40+ weeks. They will push for abortion of newborns and potentially beyond. The cult of death has no bounds. https://t.co/zCY5Y
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
Şu da bambaşka bir boyut, yorum yapamıyorum: https://t.co/vt2dfmt4Mz
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
RT @secularprolife: So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very u…
@SethDillon They've been conditioned to associate parasitic criminals with oppressed victims and innocent babies with parasites. "A fetus isn't a person!" "But there's no difference between a late-term fetus and a newborn." "Oh, newborns aren't people eit
So many pro-choice arguments against fetal personhood flirt with the infanticide line. That should make everyone very uncomfortable. Unfortunately, some people have just accepted it: https://t.co/BfErn56q5C #secularprolife https://t.co/CaMTOKxAId
RT @Jason_Vonderau: @MaudMaron Infanticide is precisely the end game. https://t.co/lTX1juMc0O
RT @Jason_Vonderau: @RedditMoments_ It won't be long before many start demanding publicly what scholars like Peter Singer, Alberto Giubilin…
@MaudMaron Infanticide is precisely the end game. https://t.co/lTX1juMc0O
@RedditMoments_ It won't be long before many start demanding publicly what scholars like Peter Singer, Alberto Giubilini and Francesco Minerva have been arguing for in academia...a return of infanticide or "after-birth abortion". https://t.co/lTX1juMc0O
3/ ...w tym w przypadkach, gdy noworodek nie jest niepełnosprawny.” – Źródło: J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):261-3; After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/w8oVlskT6R
@DiabolRokita To stanowczo za mało, postep musi iść dalej. Teraz czas na aborcję postnatalną! https://t.co/z200OV63Xs
@GavirroDiostre1 @bjorknerdi @zyapz Y en el neotaticidio llegan casi al 100% de los casos. Por eso las feministas buscan legalizar el neonaticidio bajo el eufemismo de "aborto post parto". https://t.co/Xja8ggIS09
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/Qn2rRX2NQK
@Iewoose By the way: https://t.co/97YhSKgsBp
#Australia what the HECK is going there???? You claim the right to kill your children after birth? @john_bumblebee @Denachtzuster1 @superjan @PvanHouwelingen @thierrybaudet
We should look at #Australia where 'after-birth abortion' is being pushed. Very, very disturbing things are going on. Please share https://t.co/SQJN43e7iS Watch video starting at 55 minutes to hear https://t.co/jPtRK6tmXk https://t.co/4cZblr3dlI
@4HumanUnity 1. Abortion rights activists are now pushing for “post birth abortion” and even the BMJ “justifies” killing babies after, as well as before birth. https://t.co/Y4SJkiz72s 2. Abortion causes “harm and death” to the unborn or “post born” child.
"No one actually agrees with that." Yeah, for the most part, "fetal non-personhood" proponents aren't that consistent. But it's not a new idea: https://t.co/dHXvYxI4pq
RT @CarlosMontas13: Proponen asesinato de bebés nacidos. #infanticidio Los bebés aún no son "personas reales", sólo "personas posibles", so…
RT @CarlosMontas13: Proponen asesinato de bebés nacidos. #infanticidio Los bebés aún no son "personas reales", sólo "personas posibles", so…
Cualquier día de estos leeremos acerca de las bondades de la pena de muerte. ¿Por qué Giubilini y Minerva van a quedarse únicamente en una determinada franja etaria pudiendo hacerse extensiva a otras con los debidos "argumentos"?
RT @CarlosMontas13: Proponen asesinato de bebés nacidos. #infanticidio Los bebés aún no son "personas reales", sólo "personas posibles", so…
RT @mlukacs: El "aborto" de recien nacidos es moralmente aceptable y justificable. Asi lo sostienen los pro-infanticidas Alberto Giubilini…
@LisaMaroney7 @DoomScroling From the Journal of Medical Ethics. https://t.co/GiFyJmJHxO https://t.co/FM6NINPJX9
@bssnplyrmom @dragon_Bruin @MarkWarner Legal in New York, Virginia and California. Politifact is garbage left wing propaganda. https://t.co/87bmIQXNfG
@JustDave67 @Kdubtru https://t.co/U9URvOmoUS NY and CA allow up to 30 days after birth. MD had a bill in I think 2020 (if it passed we'd hear more about it) to extend this to a year. The HEK293 used in your precious injections most likely came from a 6
@__ew__gross__ @Michell54409290 @FindingRory2 @JohnBoy95_M @AbortionChat Oh yeah? Just listen to former Governor Ralph Northam's words. Or read any of the abundant articles about it. https://t.co/0QG854Rrrn
@maryforidaho @IMAO_ On Brave (Chrome variant), right clicking and hitting copy (not copy link) gets you the proper url. I'm going to try to give it to you again though: https://t.co/MhK7En7UEd I'll break it here by adding a space. https: //jme.bmj.com/
@maryforidaho @IMAO_ Nobody on the side of choice is in favor of infanticide? Are you sure about that? https://t.co/MhK7En7UEd
@dialmformolly @njdotcom By the way, there IS support for post-birth abortion . . . https://t.co/VQhHFZTFLS
@mortalcassie @DLMILTON @connell_tc @HillaryClinton You are right it is called infanticide. Yet it does happen today. Rare events are still events and the Democrats will not ban the practice. Why not? Bill Clinton already told us where the “Devil” resides.
@mortalcassie @DLMILTON @connell_tc @HillaryClinton Actually you might want to research the after birth abortion debate and legal arguments. It actually happens today. Rare but it does happen. It is a logical conclusion of the pro-choice logic. https://t.
@Michele_Joli @tjcavalierlewis @IliaCoaching There have literally been politicians and others that said a baby could be aborted after it is born. https://t.co/WA34GuoQZu
RT @PielDeLo: @alicky_ @labruja_medusa Problema tuyo. Dato mata relato. Tanto es así que las mujeres son las principales filicidas que hay…
@alicky_ @labruja_medusa Problema tuyo. Dato mata relato. Tanto es así que las mujeres son las principales filicidas que hay todo un movimiento que busca justificarlas "científicamente" bajo el eufemismo de "aborto post parto" After-birth abortion: why sh
RT @RestrainHer: @AbortionChat Aborts doing abort things 🤷♀️ https://t.co/DQQGweHbP7
@BkHart1 @FiggyTater @westtexas_mama @RageMichelle Whether or not it exists, it has been argued for for a decade. https://t.co/m4QqdTAXDw
@twt2718 "The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual." It is not pervasive, but does have advocates. https://t.co/GK1xd2ukJ