@fionawoods46 @CCamosy From the Journal of Medical Ethics, 2013. But not an anomaly in the literature. Infanticide has been defended by a variety of philosophers and bioethicists in the leading journals over the past 50 years. https://t.co/N9MSRt4HDK
@jrpsaki Some liberal academics extend the logic for abortion to argue in favor of allowing "after birth" abortion. From "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" (https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf): https://t.co/LpGuFzGLaR
@PMarciniak_ @WTumanowicz Już tu na TT ludzie wrzucali linki, że są już postulaty, żeby umożliwić aborcję poporodową: https://t.co/fsDsNUuRYE
@CDzwoni Podstawy teoretyczne już są przygotowywane i dyskutowane, a ta "Pani" może okazać się konserwatystką. https://t.co/UZjYuEaojy
@alfranken No one called. It asked me to send you this article: https://t.co/srPYxrFo1t
@jrpsaki "No one" called. They sent this article for you to read: https://t.co/srPYxrFo1t
@harrisdecker I think they want post birth https://t.co/OW7DKVcxDg
@_lemosari https://t.co/bKTwZ0KDew https://t.co/tlZKWy0tXE A primeira fonte é um artigo de dois defensores do infanticídio e a segunda é sobre Peter Singer, o mais conhecido nesse tema. Além desses, você também pode consultar o Projeto de Lei 669 do Sena
@KlaudiaDomagala To już jest dosyć konserwatywne podejście, bo następny krok to ... https://t.co/UZjYuEaojy
@LFaulenzer @mmigalski A nie? Już się o tym dyskutuje w poważnych periodykach After-birth abortion: why should the baby live https://t.co/R4uskUQigl
So it has come to this. We are swimming in dangerous waters. https://t.co/kuvVvMqqNY
RT @MinistryofTru16: #MoT Say what? After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of Medical Ethics https://t.co/WKBa0XVZGT
RT @Kmor002mor: Science ist meins!
Science ist meins!
RT @MinistryofTru16: #MoT Say what? After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of Medical Ethics https://t.co/WKBa0XVZGT
RT @b4sedpsychology: Friendly reminder warum es ein Fehler war die Guillotinen auf den Marktplätzen voreilig zu verschrotten: https://t.co…
#MoT Say what? After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of Medical Ethics https://t.co/WKBa0XVZGT
RT @b4sedpsychology: Friendly reminder warum es ein Fehler war die Guillotinen auf den Marktplätzen voreilig zu verschrotten: https://t.co…
@MagdaIena1423 @heretyczka_ @BartoszNowakKM Aborcja to wywołanie poronienia. Np Aborcja w 7 miesiącu tym różni się od wywołania porodu w 7 miesiącu że uprzednio podaje się dziecku truciznę np. zastrzyk fenolu. Śmierć dziecka jest warunkiem koniecznym udane
@oortmist @KAndersonAkron @piper4missouri Sound like satanists 👇 https://t.co/RAobZ2He1A
RT @JackHelioTroph: @Telegraph Just saving the NHS the trouble of putting them on whatever they now call the Liverpool Care Pathway. https:…
@Telegraph Just saving the NHS the trouble of putting them on whatever they now call the Liverpool Care Pathway. https://t.co/w2m8mwaiZr
@PadamPadam321 @DuccioTessadri basta per favore ci sono decine di proposte per aborto postnatale, c'è una chiara lobby basta https://t.co/F4p20jM16O
@morgfair Ahem: (1) https://t.co/1FRhEUG9QL Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons,
@LaurenMKinsey @morgfair That would be the position of most people, but some liberals argue otherwise: https://t.co/e74brnWz9Y
@mmdesoer @morgfair @Mel_iss__a There are liberals arguing for "after-birth abortion." These aren't lies, thery're facts. https://t.co/e74brnWz9Y
@morgfair This is completely false. Liberal professors have published papers arguing for "after-birth abortion." For example: https://t.co/e74brnWz9Y
@sancheezer @redusa21 Then why have there been attempts to block after-birth abortion bills? https://t.co/wKe9mK8Ecy https://t.co/wdVQATTgl5 https://t.co/013jsQAZDS https://t.co/Q3gjQZNOz7 https://t.co/hF85PaeSZl https://t.co/XhaZtMYSFv
@Wbtesq @ArtThePedant @in_the_sky34221 @secularprolife https://t.co/a5gRCLYMut You folks not interested in being logically consistent I see.
@melJsaysso @ArtThePedant @in_the_sky34221 @secularprolife Oh they do. They do. https://t.co/a5gRCLYMut
Abortion arguments also justify infanticide, "[W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus." https://t.co/l9bb8DdP8j …
@MooreAlecia @rlacrow @JeanneBeesBuzz @ThiefPenitent @mmpadellan @Aaron2502881624 No, they ACTUALLY DO in certain blue run cities. Post birth abortion (evil, evil, evil) is actually a thing. https://t.co/vNniOGSru0
@DeSantisWarRoom I didn't know they were still stopping at birth. https://t.co/awWdHBNhVf
@LilaGraceRose @laralogan It's all part of what the far Left wants. They believe you should be able to abort a baby up to the age of 2 years. https://t.co/w2m8mwaiZr
@lizabethdevon @RepPressley Really? https://t.co/iqBLeqZLKg https://www.?.com/blogs/she-the-people/post/after-birth-abortion-can-they-be-serious/2012/03/03/gIQADgiOsR_blog.html And if it's not a thing, why is this necessary? https://t.co/cxddfrC0qd
@Pete70872255 @deemadigan @yumichild There is no rush. Most Australian states allow abortion up to the morning of the birth. Some US states allow abortion as long as the baby is not fully out as a partial birth abortion Monash University is pushing for af
@Breaking911 If it had happened in California they'd have called her brave. https://t.co/w2m8mwaiZr
@CleggAdrienne @NSanctification There are literally people arguing in journals of medical ethics that it’s ethically permissible to put to death children which have just been born. https://t.co/8LxuSsn0K1
Geez that slope got awfully slippery, didn’t it? This is the most evil thing I’ve read in a long time.
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
Doomed. When killing babies is proposed as a serious plan, we're already over the cliff. WTH is wrong with these people? 😡
RT @DrKarlynB: They're literally making the argument that killing a baby AFTER is the same as an abortion prior to birth, and therefore mor…
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
They told me it wouldn’t happen …
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @JackHelioTroph: Ted believes we should be able to murder babies. https://t.co/w2m8mwaiZr
Liberals are shayateen.
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @DrKarlynB: They're literally making the argument that killing a baby AFTER is the same as an abortion prior to birth, and therefore mor…
RT @DrKarlynB: They're literally making the argument that killing a baby AFTER is the same as an abortion prior to birth, and therefore mor…
They're literally making the argument that killing a baby AFTER is the same as an abortion prior to birth, and therefore morally defensible if abortion is. People will think they're supporting an abortion-after-birth argument, but they're really supportin
@DrKarlynB Academic journals making case for post birth abortion and why
An article to warm hearts everywhere talking about 'after birth abortion'.🖤 But surely the title should be> "When is murder acceptable?"
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
Yes, the Death Cult really went there. https://t.co/Q5fAuY2WKM
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
RT @CraigMurphy8881: @JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
@ConceptualJames “We” aren’t doing any of this shit. https://t.co/1pHMJaGZgE
Leftism is a death cult https://t.co/1pHMJaGZgE
@JoshWalkos @ConceptualJames It's already in the academic journals. https://t.co/LuT4ZSWpWf
Moral Relativism is already here: 🤮https://t.co/EfvNd9g8Cc @EndWokeness @libsoftiktok
Ted believes we should be able to murder babies. https://t.co/w2m8mwaiZr
@tedlieu @BasedSolutions1 Then you agree that both fetuses and newborns do not have the status of people and we should be able to "post birth abort" children up to 2 years old? They aren't really people, right? Let's just kill inconvenient newborns. Don't
@Alavei9 @krassenstein @KristiTalmadge The line is what everyone is arguing over. For some it's when it becomes a living, human life with its own DNA. For some, it's when it takes its first breath. For a very few, it's somewhere around 2 years old. ht
@AnaKasparian Why stop at 9 months? https://t.co/cHQ5Xij3hv
@AutumninBoulder @defytears @AnaKasparian @99Mortred @philthatremains In your fantasy world: “Nobody ever in the existence of humanity would want to do this!” In reality: A medical journal arguing it’s completely ETHICAL to terminate a healthy baby afte
@AfroRicanDREAM @Aunny8849 @rlperez4 @cenkuygur "‘Yes, We Are Serious’: ‘Ethicists’ Defend ‘After-Birth Abortion’" https://t.co/EIBNhS6gHF ... https://t.co/RTmlx991Pj ...https://t.co/kp0a0bBtYF
@anna_jones21 @theweeflea @HarrietHarman Well done, you're an idiot...: https://t.co/kcVavhkTYa
@LakotaMan1 @highbrow_nobrow @justinbaragona I asked the same question, googled and stumbled upon this. https://t.co/2e3DzeDOw4
@fred_guttenberg @jaketapper @GovRonDeSantis Hmm, It never happens, It doesn't Exist, Right Wing Talking Point... But Extensively Written about as Acceptable and Moral in a Journal of Medical Ethics 🫢🤪🤡🤡🤡 https://t.co/YjOdWV7kvL
@fred_guttenberg @jaketapper @GovRonDeSantis Here you go Fred, wrong as always https://t.co/fbBNtsYhKJ
RT @boni_castellane: La questione esiste da anni e vede contrapposti due mondi: da una parte noi e dall'altra i depenalizzatori dell'infant…
RT @boni_castellane: La questione esiste da anni e vede contrapposti due mondi: da una parte noi e dall'altra i depenalizzatori dell'infant…
compresi i casi in cui il neonato non è disabile." https://t.co/HX1aOX9Kfl
Non so se ci rendiamo conto: "Mostrando che (1) sia i feti che i neonati non hanno lo stesso status morale delle persone reali, (2) il fatto che entrambi siano persone potenziali è moralmente irrilevante e
RT @boni_castellane: La questione esiste da anni e vede contrapposti due mondi: da una parte noi e dall'altra i depenalizzatori dell'infant…