Incredibly offensive paper in the Jnl of Med Ethics calling for 'after birth abortion' of disabled infants: http://t.co/FSTInKcZ #disability
Hace mucho que no leía algo tan polémico http://t.co/xXnysXWH
RT @tonyneal02: http://t.co/9ntZiirD this article forwarded from the gospel coalition is absolutely terrifying - #worsethansodomandgomorrah #Godsaveus
RT @rattlecans: What the hell are these Medical Ethicists getting up to here? This is so so dodgy. FFS. http://t.co/O71iZ0Gz (h/t @gwenhwyfaer )
thx to @thechurchmouse for link to best anti-abortion article i have read - it's promoting 'after-birth abortion'. http://t.co/AIKGJ4vd
Breaks my heart that some would argue even a newborn is not a "person". http://t.co/5Vbs7YvT #brokenhearted
Aborto postnatal http://t.co/3i1BCIZ2. Brutal artículo que me tiene descolocado. @querolus @aleluke80 @Etpluribus @imolro @carmenvilmen
RT @rattlecans: What the hell are these Medical Ethicists getting up to here? This is so so dodgy. FFS. http://t.co/O71iZ0Gz (h/t @gwenhwyfaer )
RT @rattlecans: @Sandyd68 This is very worrying. Word needs to go out I reckon http://t.co/O71iZ0Gz
This is what passes for moral reasoning in modern academia: After-birth "abortions" if you, ya know, change your mind. http://t.co/mvL3sSOp
I can't even believe this is a real article. http://t.co/JADu3Bf6
http://t.co/wn4y96Yi I read just the abstract of this article and it made my stomach hurt
The article arguing for "after-birth abortions" http://t.co/g5RrHxHc
Further Down the Spiral. Thanks for the share Todd. http://t.co/nQsRpXwV
RT @rattlecans: What the hell are these Medical Ethicists getting up to here? This is so so dodgy. FFS. http://t.co/O71iZ0Gz (h/t @gwenhwyfaer )
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics http://t.co/dlinNIZk #itsalmostover
http://t.co/9ntZiirD this article forwarded from the gospel coalition is absolutely terrifying - #worsethansodomandgomorrah #Godsaveus
RT @xcoffeezombiex: MT“@rattlecans: What the hell are these Medical Ethicists getting up to here? ... http://t.co/fXHPWp4p (h/t @gwenhwyfaer )” TW: ableism
“@rattlecans: @Sandyd68 This is very worrying. Word needs to go out I reckon http://t.co/e2e8c83l” @BrightonPC FFS!
MT“@rattlecans: What the hell are these Medical Ethicists getting up to here? ... http://t.co/fXHPWp4p (h/t @gwenhwyfaer )” TW: ableism
People are advocating for after-birth abortion-aka, the murder of a baby. http://t.co/H0bntiMf
If this is real then this is the most disturbing thing you will read today. | http://t.co/SRLQHcL0
'After-Birth Abortions'? I might suggest a few Republicans, but these bio-ethicists make a serious case for it #ethics http://t.co/fOSDZy1c
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
@surgucation If this doesn't fully illustrate the flaws in utilitarian systems of ethics, nothing ever will: http://t.co/E5ypTmUB #sinister
Can't believe: after birth abortion proposal, isn't a murder? http://t.co/pvZdeDXZ
http://t.co/AAYfNOYF - Similar After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? -- Giubilini and ...
@DoctorChristian Illustration of the need for moral imperatives in medicine: http://t.co/E5ypTmUB #sinister
@bengoldacre Illustration of the need for moral imperatives in medicine: http://t.co/E5ypTmUB #sinister
The fact this was published is nearly as disturbing as this sick and perverse article itself. Maranatha! http://t.co/ODnvcnxT
Grufull logisk konsekvens i Journal of Medical Ethics: "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" http://t.co/1c61QhVe
Some people are sick in the head and shouldn't share our planet. http://t.co/Iap6Xhgs
Margaret Sanger approves this article. Journal of Medical Ethics: "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" http://t.co/G1385Cfr
Hva?! "Å avlive nyfødte barn bør være lovlig på lik linje med vanlig abort". Fra respekterte Journal of Medical Ethics http://t.co/1c61QhVe
Just horrific. "‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is" http://t.co/DBsEm4WU
What is this? http://t.co/yHawVyYM #abortion
@Freddie_Pimm have you seen this or just the Herald article? http://t.co/CbNMHnUN
http://t.co/tnCr3SzA - "Aborcja pourodzeniowa" czyli jak kogoś nie stać na dziecko to...
Fri abort ja naturligtvis men detta----> forskare: "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? http://t.co/c5q51Bwx
being consistent about abortion - "after-birth abortion’should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is" http://t.co/m5TNZ16N
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
The editor's column worth reading too: http://t.co/5VU8kK2i
SICK, SICK, SICK. They would step up to prevent animals from being killed, but not healthy, already born human... http://t.co/RjvF7EEi
I think even the dolphin huggers wld agree that infanticide is always wrong. Wouldn't they? http://t.co/iph3eFIv
2day's doublespeak: #infanticide is ok cause a baby isn't "a ‘person’ in a morally relevant sense" http://t.co/mWjzwPXj #tcot #slipperyslope
The next step in justifying killing. After-birth abortion also known as infanticide is defended in this article.... http://t.co/XGIxlAFb
I imagine that @drpetersaunders may have a few things to say about the @JMedEthics_BMJ article... http://t.co/xkWkP6O6
For all interested in the abortion debate, a piece putting the argument for "after birth abortions" forward... http://t.co/t5dZOdmL
“@amtklooster: Abortus na de geboorte? Heet dat niet gewoon 'doden'? Met stomheid geslagen. http://t.co/g70JMV5T”
After birth abortion? http://t.co/iph3eFIv This beggars belief. Why do we want to deprive ourselves of any more children? Upsetting.
Gli #infanticidi sono legittimi secondo un filosofo dell'Un di Milano che firma un paper shock sul J. of Medical Ethics http://t.co/TLkIQQ1X
@pmphillips @thechurchmouse If it is a spoof, why would @JMedEthics_BMJ feel the need to publish a defence? http://t.co/Djz2F76H
There are so many things wrong with this, I don't even know where to start. http://t.co/9w2v1SXG
Abortus na de geboorte? Heet dat niet gewoon 'doden'? Met stomheid geslagen. http://t.co/T5vSjP90
¡ATENCIÓN! Matar a un recién nacido puede ser éticamente permisible en todas las circunstancias en que el aborto lo sea http://t.co/3tszthFg
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/OSq7Haay
Truly abhorrent article in @JMedEthics_BMJ on 'after-birth abortion'. Astonishing. http://t.co/zfN6L8w4
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
RT @thechurchmouse: For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/FsRfeBz3
For those asking whether @JMedEthics_BMJ article on 'after-birth abortion' is a spoof, here it is http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
@payamtorabi This is an interesting one: http://t.co/WdaFaPvM :-|
Como reconhecer um filho da p***? "the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn)... http://t.co/elb3YSXy
For the second time in 2 days, I fear I have woken up in a novel by Jonathan Swift: http://t.co/Yu4lSMX2
I'm so glad we have professional, academic bioethicists to sort through the tough issues. http://t.co/bodGXzau h/t @cboyack
Ésta es la mentalidad de los ocultistas del #NOM y de su odio por la raza humana: http://t.co/k7iqjnz1
RT @KarenJewel: After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? http://t.co/mv8eW1o0 (This is where acceptance of abortion has led us)
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? http://t.co/IjNdvlJe (This is where acceptance of abortion has led us)
RT @MCrutchmer: Philosophically, this is a logical step; morally, this is shocking and sad. Kyrie eleison: http://t.co/uhAFDdMn
RT @pamjweb: After birth abortions - this is really scary. Don't get that new borns aren't "actual" people http://t.co/u5e0TAy2
God help us! Medical Ethics journal article argues for logical next step: "After-birth abortions" (i.e., #infanticide): http://t.co/zJcLOhsR
After-birth abortions advocated in peer reviewed medical ethics journal http://t.co/NIoRz2IG Lord have mercy!
Infanticide is now OK (just don't call it that): http://t.co/ErBTh9p7 This. Is. Wrong.
RT @simonlucas: This is very disturbing indeed. // BMJ: After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? http://t.co/Jp8RUe4M
The most shocking, absurd, & heartbreaking thing I've read in a long time...a logically consistent pro-choice position. http://t.co/113IvMX4
http://t.co/TjpuIGpG || Destroy academia.
http://t.co/CAZf1YfL JournalofMedicalEthics, arg 4 'after-birth' abortion. Satire? #Theycan'tbeserious. In most places, this is murder.
Extraordinary article in the BMJ. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? http://t.co/CXaA3pX7
So infanticide should be labeled as 'after-birth abortion'? Omg, humanity is filled with idiots. http://t.co/HoWKQXyp
"Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life." http://t.co/k4ltttVV
@HobbitsWife Here's the original article from the Journal of Medical Ethics. http://t.co/xSzPZXpn
"...both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons" http://t.co/k4ltttVV
God help us! Afterbirth Abortion! WHAT??? by showing that…newborns are not actual persons??? NO NO NO!!! http://t.co/FsRfeBz3
BMJ "Why should the Baby Live" in full RT @JPWalsh_Esq: @fresh_squeezed @GuidoFawkes @jameschappers The full article. http://t.co/KccKN0Pn
http://t.co/vVt5gCCN Artigo propõe que seja lícito matar bebês recém nascidos se pais não quiserem criá-los. Onde vamos parar desse jeito?
erm... 'After-Birth Abortion', well that's an interesting medical ethics stance. It's fair to say I don't really agree. http://t.co/GvNi2A9E
In deep shock at the call for killing newborns.- http://t.co/B9yCl3kp These people are Eugenicists not Ethicists !!!!!
Chilling proposal in the BMJ/JME for 'after-birth abotion' on grounds such as cost of bringing up children http://t.co/T5bFWvMa
@GuidoFawkes @jameschappers @thechurchmouse The full text is worse than the abstract: http://t.co/oyq68Kz3
Can you believe this? After-Birth Abortion:"both fetuses & newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons http://t.co/oxVDY6UA
RT @eleonorapoli1: Allucinante!! http://t.co/fxYZOfKU
Allucinante!! http://t.co/fxYZOfKU
"After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" (bron: http://t.co/zpky0Q9a ) Deze paper bepleit mi eerder filosofisch consequent te zijn.
@fresh_squeezed @GuidoFawkes @jameschappers The full article. http://t.co/N4P0NL1M
Wat is de morele status van een pasgeboren kind en verschilt dat van een echt mens of van een foetus? http://t.co/atGEmB6g
BMJ article advocates post-natal abortion: http://t.co/Il3yp68F -- I'm calling deep-cover conservative troll on this one.
It's not enough to beat & humiliate our children; now we want to kill them as well? How did they become so callous? http://t.co/LXnySGIa
RT @Ads21: I'm simply dumbfounded by the inhumanity http://t.co/iCfxRE8G