"Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is." http://t.co/SxP2Nu1k J Med Ethics
http://t.co/kHvuNOOK Academic journal: "After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?" It's not like Ex. 20:13 has ever slowed you down.
Read this horrifying abstract of an article published in a medical ethics journal. Not only is it horrifying,... http://t.co/KZwqoTNi
More ethical chaos:After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? -- Giubilini & Minerva -- Journal of Medical Ethics http://t.co/fHaas3iK
Unbelievable: After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? - http://t.co/1vK3Ifrl
L'Avvenire ha un editoriale http://t.co/sLHpv51m contro un articolo di cui sembra aver letto solo il riassunto online http://t.co/6gJr2YnD
Horrifying: "After birth abortion: Why should the baby live?" http://t.co/YhccbzwL how universities can hire these people is beyond me
OMG "After birth abortion - why should they live?" 2 Australian medical 'professionals' argue in Medical Ethics journal http://t.co/WI9O3t9r
RT @MurrayJCampbell: stunned. shocked. but not completely surprised. http://t.co/MBjNHbsF
RT @MurrayJCampbell: stunned. shocked. but not completely surprised. http://t.co/MBjNHbsF
stunned. shocked. but not completely surprised. http://t.co/MBjNHbsF
RT @michaelbd: Why shouldn't we kill infants? http://t.co/ZNzR3mz9). Oh, you're saying we should.
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? -- Giubilini and Minerva -- Journal of Medical Ethics http://t.co/MMd8KoWm via @addthis
..."and among these are xxxx, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."...... http://t.co/4RF2IBVe
RT @dianamee: Diabolical - literally. "‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible" http://t.co/vcEpYZmc
If it's OK to kill 'real people' in utero, what's to stop 'after-birth abortions'? -argues ethicists...yup, this... http://t.co/AmbHLjZM
RT @dianamee: Diabolical - literally. "‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible" http://t.co/vcEpYZmc
RT @dianamee: Diabolical - literally. "‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible" http://t.co/vcEpYZmc
Diabolical - literally. "‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible" http://t.co/vcEpYZmc
or, how narrow moral circles get scary fast RT @michaelbd: Why shouldn't we kill infants? http://t.co/qkKrBQNR Oh, you're saying we should.
Why shouldn't we kill infants? http://t.co/ZNzR3mz9). Oh, you're saying we should.
"After birth abortion" aka infanticide presented in "Journal for Medical Ethics": http://t.co/yKZ9P21u #fb
http://t.co/FRytiei5 When did we lose our humanity? Really?
Disgusting, http://t.co/OihG05w1 these people are corrupt and evil. Pseudo intellectual morons twisted in their thoughts.
In a conversation with someone from the Students for Life society, they asked me what I thought about this paper:... http://t.co/tbUt7bjt
Everything old is new again. After-birth abortion, the new name for infanticide h/t Bioedge http://t.co/IfUE9rx3
3 "bonnes" raisons avancées par des chercheurs, pour accepter l'avortement post-natal au même titre que l'avortement : http://t.co/ljWOFNmV
なるほど。読んだはずですが、忘れていました…。 RT @tsuneduka: ディックの「まだ人間じゃない」の世界が現実に? RT @kayukawajunji: んッ!? RT @spitzibara「出生後中絶」の正当化論。 target="_blank" href="http://t.co/TJxdMPnu">http://t.co/TJxdMPnu
んッ!? RT @spitzibara: J.of Medical Ethicsに、「出生後中絶」の正当化論。http://t.co/TJxdMPnu