@Petra_C_M_P Und die beim British Medical Journal sind auch alle schwurbler https://t.co/Kd8gUS2VdG
@Petra_C_M_P Nö, bin ja kein Mitarbeiter. Aber ich habe u.a. die BNT162b2 postmarketing experience gelesen (siehe Bild), sowie https://t.co/J1JclJRq8t, und so gut wie alle geleakten Beschaffungsverträge ...und ich bin bei klarem Verstand https://t.co/7Dv
@yeahnaa333 @Christii3131 @JeromeAdamsMD @bickfordblue So there were no allegations of fraud with evidence from anyone involved in operating the trials? https://t.co/fd9EHuon4x
@Veritatem2021 @ILOVETINY @_InThisTogether @jasoneclarke It's obvious what Kimberly IS proving "Rigorous" pmsl "Told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adve
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial https://t.co/7bLW0PkEHl
RT @TexasLindsay_: 6. In fact, an editor of The British Medical Journal was so alarmed, he hired an investigative team to look into her cla…
@jon_stavros @FreeThinkerFit Oh, nothing. Just pointing out the fraudulous history of a company which finances academic institutions which in turn pay the professors which "debunk" all harmful effects of the products it sells. https://t.co/VA6BTnL2fw
@BreezerGalway @DrCarolJasper @Stirling_Health @StirUni @brignewspaper @PfizerMed "Irrelevant to the safety and efficacy of the approved C19 vaccines" Ya really think so? "What is your point?" So, let me see. "Non-essential" workers were ordered to "Stay H
@debralex57 @FactsAreGood You do know about the corrupt way the entire trial was carried out, right? https://t.co/rGOR3AFXY6
@higgsri @jonathanstea Can you comprehend what's written even in the mainstream? https://t.co/5Tgtm73LBd
@Haruhito_BAK 不備や齟齬だらけなのだ。哀れな臣民よ、まず第一にこの製剤の安全性など確立されていない。たった数万の製薬会社の治験ごっこで騙された。そしてその試験は不正だし総死亡は減らない。ましてやLNPは多所に分布。全てがお粗末なのである。https://t.co/u9q9lR2tAm https://t.co/T5UTIrnBUh
@AtxDem @deesnider @ow08179938 @FiveTimesAugust Vaccine research: https://t.co/VA6BTnL2fw
RT @felicittina: L'affaire #Ventavia révélée par le #BMJ n'est-elle qu'un grain de sable dans un rouage ou une rustine qui lâche sur la par…
@minsaude @secomvc @mjspgov @gov_mcti @AdvocaciaGeral @CGUonline https://t.co/KmlvdJ7sr2…"Covid-19: Pesquisadora denuncia problemas de integridade de dados nos ensaios da vacina Pfizer"
@Annamericali @normanpie @mawojciechowski @TomaszKaczanow1 @JNizinkiewicz Same badania preparatów mRNA prizera to dobry przykład fałszerstwa, co opisał sam pracownik, który miał za zadanie kontrolować te badania. https://t.co/cqPE4Sd2KS
@LeftSideStrong5 @ElectionWiz oh you mean this clinical trial? the trial run by the companies who are immune from liability and that repeatedly falsify their studies and have paid billions in fines?: https://t.co/tRK5gxeqAj
https://t.co/Oy1Z6Xmdlf"Covid-19: Pesquisadora denuncia problemas de integridade de dados nos ensaios da vacina Pfizer"
@podz4 @reinfoquebec Ta yeule. https://t.co/VA6BTnL2fw
RT @felicittina: L'affaire #Ventavia révélée par le #BMJ n'est-elle qu'un grain de sable dans un rouage ou une rustine qui lâche sur la par…
RT @felicittina: L'affaire #Ventavia révélée par le #BMJ n'est-elle qu'un grain de sable dans un rouage ou une rustine qui lâche sur la par…
@lukner @Storiesofinjury You: “Firstly, Pfizer has a strong commitment to research integrity and transparency” Me: You must have missed the Whistleblower article in BMJ @IamBrookJackson https://t.co/MSLfyhMzeF https://t.co/Lk3LpNSE1A
@DennisRadTech @Censored4sure Fraud? "A regional director has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s p3 trial." - https:/
@BarryESharp @higgsri @MarkWar16520311 The Pfizer trials are open to question: https://t.co/Ju07lOZx46
"One said that she had worked on over four dozen clinical trials in her career, including many large trials, but had never experienced such a “helter skelter” work environment as with Ventavia on Pfizer’s trial." https://t.co/unBNZ6fVe9
@DopplerEffect93 @Hampson14Jane @AllenDMartin @KarlSinclair10 @Debunk_the_Funk And were the BMJ fooled ? Or is there some substance to people's concerns ? https://t.co/RVCfIQRkNO
@fabiominelli @marcosalvestrin @donata_vigoni @Fibonacci2134 @iosonoUmanoX @FanCooler2 @lamanuzzicri @danielebanfi83 Le mail sono autentiche, arrivano dai server dell'AIFA e non sono state smentite. Anche i documenti di Pfizer si inventano in 10 minuti sop
@pbockerman @VVElomaa IJVTPR on tuore ja tuntematon julkaisija, mutta keskeiset seikat kliinisten tutkimusten manipuloinnista ja viranomaisvalvonnan puutteista on todettu arvostettujenkin journaalien (mm. BMJ ja Elsevier) sivuilla. Kliinisten tutkimusten
@facts_stick @robbot4000 @redheadlass1402 @PierreKory That’s not true, we just covered why. Not everyone wants the vaccine. This is ethical as long as there are consenting participants. By the way, allegations against Pfizer include consent issues. Tha
@IanCopeland5 Anti-vax Claim #5 ‘The placebo group were unblinded during the Pfizer trials’ Was this also a fact? https://t.co/eCZYgKR2Xs https://t.co/rUnHn9ZaYx
@RobertRees_ @BrianONeilLS1 @NickHudsonCT Was the man in the street or those on their ancestral farm with no WiFi told to read the BMJ report? They weren’t even told they were Guinea pigs or given informed consent. Many of us read the original Pfizer data
@AllanPartanen Myös lääketieteellisen yhteisön sisällä on esitetty kritiikkiä koronarokotteiden hyväksyntään johtaneiden tutkimusten laatua ja seurattavien tilastosuureiden objektiivisuutta kohtaan. 1. https://t.co/ETXPWoBIcr 2. https://t.co/yhBSZcmCUc
RT @Lucky17171717: @lukner @CartlandDavid In case you missed it @pfizer BMJ IT WAS BUILT ON LIES https://t.co/MSLfyhMzeF https://t.co/bWdH…
@lukner @CartlandDavid In case you missed it @pfizer BMJ IT WAS BUILT ON LIES https://t.co/MSLfyhMzeF https://t.co/bWdH9BJRBt
RT @longagnani: @FanCooler2 @piliani_zaolo @bertero_g @markorusso69 → Al BMJ sicuramente si tengono un capo redattore matto che attacca i v…
@FanCooler2 @piliani_zaolo @bertero_g @markorusso69 → Al BMJ sicuramente si tengono un capo redattore matto che attacca i vaccini a mRNA perché psicotico. Siete davvero credibili. P.s. ovviamente la Pfizer non ha mai taroccato I dati del trial... 🤦🏻 Font
@sjs856 @WotsOnInfo Drew what studies support your argument that the vaccines are safe and effective? https://t.co/T1nlznADTv
RT @f_philippot: Le prestigieux British Medical Journal publie le récit d’un lanceur d’alerte engagé dans l’essai clinique de Pfizer sur so…
@ardvark51 @1NewsNZ https://t.co/mSLTeu51Pu This one I assume? Talking about one particular research site (So not the entire study) and generally around the way patients at that particular site were treated but there's nothing in there that seems to inval
2. Pfizers Fälschungen in Fachzeitschrift (https://t.co/z3z3jdDWSp) 3. Vorzeitige Entblindung der Zulassungsstudie via Reuters (https://t.co/eVzFIoRqzn) https://t.co/qnqaEO0gVp
@ProdigalThe3rd https://t.co/zN8dyOptri Also, just to point this out data is being manipulated everywhere because of the political nature of this virus. Pfizer manipulated data link: https://t.co/hdqAjJg7BG CDC themselves, information is curated by Googl
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
. . i started out on Pfizer But soon switched to Moderna .
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
@StabellBenn @IgumRasmussen @politiken @anders_hviid Tredje eksempel der burde have vækket nysgerrigheden hos “eksperter”: https://t.co/3kprVPXYGr
@DrDavidNL @MichaelVerstrae @RoelandtDonella @Pmagazine En de farma-industrie is niet aan haar proefstuk toe. In de EU was er vooral sprake van corruptie en geheimhouding. Overheidsfuctionarissen die weigerden hun SMS-communicatie vrij te geven. Waarom? Wa
RT @bmj_latest: NEW: Our latest investigation hears from a whistleblower engaged in Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial. Her evidence r…
RT @mRNAdeaths: Almost 2 years ago integrity issues in #Pfizer’s vaccine trial. "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed i…
@MarkDavidsonAfr @Creativologist @DwhalKhul @deborahw704 @stkirsch For one you really shouldn’t trust greedy corrupt liability free corporate criminals. This should be common sense but for some like yourself it seems you have blind faith in criminals for
RT @mRNAdeaths: Almost 2 years ago integrity issues in #Pfizer’s vaccine trial. "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed i…
RT @mRNAdeaths: Almost 2 years ago integrity issues in #Pfizer’s vaccine trial. "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed i…
RT @mRNAdeaths: Almost 2 years ago integrity issues in #Pfizer’s vaccine trial. "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed i…
RT @mRNAdeaths: Almost 2 years ago integrity issues in #Pfizer’s vaccine trial. "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed i…
Almost 2 years ago integrity issues in #Pfizer’s vaccine trial. "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, & was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial." https:
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
@BigJohnInDaGaff @jsm2334 @royaltoddfather @GUstaoset @thugman112 @RichEllefritz @kevinnbass And there’s question that the safety data is skewed. It could be worse, especially since we do not have an accurate safety baseline established since they vaccinat
RT @hkakeya: 非科学的思考は反ワクチンだけでなくワクチン激賞側にも多い。新型コロナへのIVMやビタミンDの効果を示す論文の不正は、同様の結果を示す他の研究の信頼性は低めるが全否定はできない。ファイザー治験で発覚した一部不正でワクチンの効果を全否定できないのと同じ。…
@_tac0cat_ @ContrarianNews_ @Starstruck09 @Graph1159 @GidMK It's disputable that they actually applied said procedure https://t.co/d1PeAcm2BF
@aravindmc Not high quality - you’re familiar with a lot of the issues, aren’t you?
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
RT @ADevotedYogi: Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blo…
Really, is anyone not surprised? Were you aware of this already? From a Reputable Authority: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ https://t.co/00AyRcw5Tr
#Vaccinaties Artikel uit 2021!!! https://t.co/5psL1CikHd
@jpaternotte Wetenschap...🤬🤬🤬 @jpaternotte @HugodeJonge @ErnstKuipers https://t.co/rvRyr8lP3w
@NaomiAKlein A director of Ventavia Research Group told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed untrained vaccinators & was slow in reporting adverse events in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Beware Big Pharma is Big Maf
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ https://t.co/tuylBn5YOw
RT @hkakeya: 非科学的思考は反ワクチンだけでなくワクチン激賞側にも多い。新型コロナへのIVMやビタミンDの効果を示す論文の不正は、同様の結果を示す他の研究の信頼性は低めるが全否定はできない。ファイザー治験で発覚した一部不正でワクチンの効果を全否定できないのと同じ。…
ファイザーの重要なcovid-19ワクチン試験の実施を支援する受託研究会社での不十分な慣行の暴露BMJ 2021;375 doi: https://t.co/6ZvFzU6Obh (公開: 2021 年 11 月 2 日)
@LauraBromet Manipulatie met onderzoek naar #vaccins. #Ouderen en #kwetsbaren hebben het nakijken. Debat is taboe, parlementaire #enquête opgeschort cq tegengehouden. De #overheid moet aan de kant van het #volk staan en niet aan de kant van de #BigPharma i
RT @JrgnBrgmnsch: @SHomburg Im Nov21 war schon klar, dass bei dem #mRNA-#Impfstoff einiges nicht stimmt! "Enthüllungen über schlechte Prakt…
RT @alexandrosM: @ktmusd @ApertaAria Here you go. An article. In the British Medical Journal Have fun! https://t.co/yjPRWmPVu7
@ktmusd @ApertaAria Here you go. An article. In the British Medical Journal Have fun! https://t.co/yjPRWmPVu7
RT @JrgnBrgmnsch: @SHomburg Im Nov21 war schon klar, dass bei dem #mRNA-#Impfstoff einiges nicht stimmt! "Enthüllungen über schlechte Prakt…
@VegtDoor Dat is niet het volledige verhaal. De Brook Jackson rechtzaak (die Pfizer aanklaagde omdat standaard protocollen bij het toelatingsonderzoek werden geschonden op systematische wijze), laat zien, dat het hier NIET om een Vaccin gaat. https://t.co/
@jasonwoody @bennjacobs22 @CartlandDavid Like this evidence? https://t.co/T1nlznADTv
RT @annietul0: 38/ (BMJ) Rona-!9: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pf!z3r’s vackseen trial https://t.co/UONbHirhnK…