@Vanyathalias …indeed. Most annoyingly, just a bit of honest light shed on the subject by ordinary health care practitioners would almost certainly have resulted in the development of significantly lower risk therapies for those potentially most vulnerabl
RT @annietul0: 38/ (BMJ) Rona-!9: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pf!z3r’s vackseen trial https://t.co/UONbHirhnK…
Очередная "теория заговора" оказалась не теорией, а практикой: Во время клинических испытаний вакцины Pfizer от барановируса часть данных была сфальсифицирована, раскрывались личности добровольцев и скрывались негативные побочные эффекты. https://t.co/lRZ
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial https://t.co/1zHabUdhja
@maneke68945622 @BoeckBernard @weetjewat @Yvonne781550689 @vanranstmarc @Lauwke3 @TomBombadon Dit bedoel je? Waaruit bleek dat een kleine onderaannemer slordig was. Gelukkig ging het maar om 1.000 van de 44.000 deelnemers.....Of heb jij bewijs dat het om g
@thereal_truther @DrNice2022 @GringoGranadino Pathetic, but whatever. Where is skeptical raptor’s peer reviewed paper? https://t.co/SnNseJ6UUL
"One said that she had worked on over four dozen clinical trials in her career, including many large trials, but had never experienced such a “helter skelter” work environment as with Ventavia on Pfizer’s trial." https://t.co/unBNZ6fVe9
@Magnutts @Dilectus_Dei @miguelifornia @GovRonDeSantis @FLSurgeonGen And none were successful so they lied. https://t.co/jt4D1YnaL7
@PERIODISTAURINO @azucenau @MaruRFormula @LauraBruges @OSCAROLGUIN @LeonardoCurzio @LCUgalde @EuropeMex @ferbelaunzaran @MXvsCORRUPCION @amparocasar EL INACABABLE DESPRECIO POR LA RAZON POR PARTE DE LOS IDIOTAS CHUPACULOS COMO TU que te inyecten con pfize
@ETorresRivera1 @azucenau @HLGatell pero como se le ocurre, o es usted imbecil o es un pinche golpista ignorante; PFIZER esta en el ajo porque su chingadera ha causando un monton de muertos por efectos secundarios y ha desarrollado la variante de Covid lar
@israelhurtadoa por esto https://t.co/t8uoaPfQsp Pfizer actuo de manerqa poco etica, y ademas Gatell no se dejo mangonear y corromper. Nadamas eso
@osvaldocairob @DrPacoMoreno1 @DeniseDresserG Pfizer actuo de manera poco etica en esta pandemia y los miles de pacientes muertos por inyectarse su chingadera lo respaldan. https://t.co/t8uoaPfQsp
@DrPacoMoreno1 Mejor, para que quiere que nos inyecten una sustancia que ni avalada esta por el mismo USA Si quiere morirse antes vayase a que le inyecten esa basura ultra cara https://t.co/t8uoaPfQsp
@mmhoff @FrankPeeters4 Wanneer uw hart het plots begeeft en u neervalt, wanneer eerste hulp niet baat, dan overlijdt u plots. Ernstig onderzoek neemt tijd in beslag, behalve wanneer er iets aan te verdienen valt. Dan kan het allemaal heel snel. https://t.c
RT @PhilipSoos: It has been almost a week since the damning revelations that Pfizer's Covid vaccination clinical trial was rigged, aired in…
@DocHDInfinity @paulspad24 @RightWingCope It's about the culture of the company. Would you trust a criminal organization like Pfizer? Oh, and then there's this: https://t.co/3vv3Iyz9C9
@Shart_Glasto @TheDrJon The manufactures fraudulent clinical trial from 2020? Fascinating. Real world data has clearly shown the vaccines do not work and are dangerous… https://t.co/T1nlznADTv https://t.co/BjsAlj63ys https://t.co/P4P4HwaMdt
An under reported story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@frabikins @thevivafrei An under reported story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@HopeRising19 An under reported story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@VigilantFox An under reported story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@HopeRising19 An under reported story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@HopeRising19 An under reeorted story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
An under reeorted story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@MythinformedMKE An under reeorted story that comes straight from a doctor who ran the trials. https://t.co/kd4NTH6kmv
@GOAT3924261711 @fimason38 @LynHaye72192347 @NewshubNZ Sure here you go - the BMJ citing higher risk of reinfection and poor data integrity of Pfizer https://t.co/UZHVzr5iJD
@mrscorer @adrian1801 @Mr_Magoo5 @mpc_xetts Also a whistle-blower from the inside reported fraud and lost her career. Unlike those who didn't care, made and sold poison, and profited. This is from the British Medical Journal https://t.co/cA1mKKLhXt
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 元ファイザー社員の医師が「書いて欲しい事」を募集していたので査読論文を元に聞いてみるとブロックされました。「都合の悪いデータは遮断する」これが製薬会社の考えならば薬害が無くなることは無いでしょう。 https://t.co/yrdrkC…
@drjohnhmiller @JatinderHayre_ @bmj_latest @HelenRSalisbury BMJ > The Lancet BMJ has balls https://t.co/P7RowmOXKz Not that junior drs read literature...they just blindly follow guidelines They missed this https://t.co/rNec0idKiU Had they not, maybe
@jhn_steen @KlutzyEnd3 @remohen @NOS Ook een lachertje natuurlijk. Voor de FDA hield dat bijvoorbeeld in dat amper 6,2 % van alle Pfizer trial sites een controle kregen. Dit voor hun befaamde 'huge phase 3 trial' voor goedkeuring. https://t.co/o8Bu7xHnh7
@jaxxdragonan @thereal_truther Wrong again. He has already confirmed he was part of the clinical trials, and has medical records of his side effects on display. This is your opinion vs this Lawyer who hasn't been proven false. Also BMJ already sounded a
@mpc_xetts @adrian1801 @mrscorer And more evidence for you from a whistle-blower from the inside. Nothing to gain, only to lose and she still did the right thing. Unlike so many others, like yourself https://t.co/cA1mKKLPN1
@Paul86ck @maciejstelmach8 @Arachnidualny @rieske_piotr https://t.co/dJ0JpnyLnX Twoje własne źródło... https://t.co/w07iQkNo4L
@BartlomiejKozak @maciejstelmach8 @Arachnidualny @rieske_piotr Badanie preparatów pfizera, to była jedna wielka manipulacja. Kalkulacja absolutnej redukcji ryzyka na podstawie danych pfizera to 0%, a te 95% to był tylko rezultat kalkulacji względnej redukc
RT @Angama_Market: [これは重い] ファイザーの最終治験研究を請け負った会社の元地域局長が、治験結果のデータが不正改ざんされていたとブリティッシュ・メディカル・ジャーナルに内部告発。 Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistl…
@AlBowers1 @SKDitta @thereal_truther Can’t engage 😂. But trust the Pfizer data right? Pathetic. https://t.co/W2JuaX8yDt
@AlBowers1 @SKDitta @thereal_truther Ah figures you can’t answer. What is your argument again? Oh right.. nothing. Just evade, like how Pfizer evades participants data. Enjoy your beliefs in pseudoscience. Trust it. https://t.co/W2JuaX8yDt
@KalmiaLatifolia @4ryo49desu @Pinzie @P_J_Buckhaults @Jikkyleaks @Faceplants00 @Topaz20211 @pfizer @US_FDA When you have a p at .000055 on a chi-square statistic of 16.2532 for the event to happen by chance, the doubtful hypothesis is that your trial is bl
@theworstkirst @stonehenge2500 @BadVaccineTakes Here’s some information for you. https://t.co/GcbrWnSPPm
@jonathanstea Would independent studies help ? Research funded by pharmaceutical companies to test their own products has a built in conflict of intetest that urgently needs to be addressed. https://t.co/KRaZDUKQuW
@charliekirk11 I guess we have to make them come clean... https://t.co/WdiEVOJMYh
@DelmerNorquist @TheMelyssaK @Wolterkw @andreagail_k @SarahHuckabee I prefer more reliable sources, such as the the USA's DOJ & the world's most respected medical publication, The British Medical Journal, see https://t.co/9LXZgANowk and https://t.co/gG
@BHudsonWrites @JenniferSey Assuming Pfizer ran the study honestly, they were unable to show that the vaccine prevented more harm than it caused. We now know that Pfizer DID NOT run the trial honestly due to the 10,000++ pages from the study released via
@AZUL3285 @Logo_Wo @keikaikou @MNHR_Labo ...どういう意味でしょうか?当初のRCTは初期株に対する効果で、盲検化不正までやっています。変異体に対して効果は脆弱、或いは逆効果まで懸念されてきました。それが立証された極めて懸念される資料です。感染症を拡めるワクチン⁉︎とんでもない犯罪ですよこれが事実なら。https://t.co/u9q9lR2tAm
Just another reason not to trust the science 😔
@Thegillman69 @andreagail_k @SarahHuckabee Really? So you're denying Pfizer has a criminal record & is currently under investigation for fraud by one of the World's most respected medical publications, The British Medical Journal? See https://t.co/gGrz
@VP @POTUS It looks like you're trying to kill a lot of us with vaccines. https://t.co/VWlucMkLKh
@MSerdikoff @veryvirology @norky69 @US_FDA You want Ivermectin research to acutely adhere to scientific standards yet your replies are full of defending Jabs that had sabotaged control groups: https://t.co/cqJ82Zu49R And fatally flawed methods: https:
@ianfmusgrave @GidMK "the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial." https://t.co/MVLi0oADJH 'Rigour and scrutiny' giv
World News Now:
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports https://t.co/qxNabENDGp
RT @annietul0: 38/ (BMJ) Rona-!9: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pf!z3r’s vackseen trial https://t.co/UONbHirhnK…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 元ファイザー社員の医師が「書いて欲しい事」を募集していたので査読論文を元に聞いてみるとブロックされました。「都合の悪いデータは遮断する」これが製薬会社の考えならば薬害が無くなることは無いでしょう。 https://t.co/yrdrkC…
Covid-19: Forscher bläst die Pfeife auf Fragen der Datenintegrität in der Impfstoffstudie von Pfizer | The BMJ https://t.co/kNjERCgegV
@veitera @Troijanhevonen Väitteet rokotteiden kliinisten tutkimusten väärinkäytöksistä olivat salaliittoteoriota ennen kuin asia paljastettiin tiedejulkaisussa: https://t.co/rubTph8uLy
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ https://t.co/IZQgfZDuj9
@billy_bobo_ @Lozbine @AGoldsmithEsq @MaeRenneburgAlt @Silverback141 @jordanbpeterson Facinating... But Covid vaccine did not completed all trials phases prior to release (hence the special authorization needed). https://t.co/yRasEVbKbN Not to mention t
*NEJM論文に対する意見でも1回で十分という話は無視 👆図2.13B 初回💉~21⽇⽬、つまり、図2.13Aから明らかな完全な臨床免疫が突然発現12日+9⽇後、 ⾎中の中和抗体の量はbackground levelを僅か上回るまで⬆️ 中和抗体の最⼤levelは初回💉後28⽇⽬のみ観察 改竄内部告発 https://t.co/MExeFo4Njo
RT @thackerpd: 9 months later, @bmj_latest my investigation that found data integrity problems in Pfizer’s COVID-19 clinical trial, based o…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 元ファイザー社員の医師が「書いて欲しい事」を募集していたので査読論文を元に聞いてみるとブロックされました。「都合の悪いデータは遮断する」これが製薬会社の考えならば薬害が無くなることは無いでしょう。 https://t.co/yrdrkC…
@CTPuzzlePieces @Chrisma24254241 @David_Cormack True information. https://t.co/s2mWtxYmQJ
@doktweet @veen_els @Doc_Box @pjvanerp @doktweet jij bent geen geneeskundige. Jij bent kritiekloze dozenschuiver voor bigpharma. Je eigen kinderen in gevaar brengen . . https://t.co/e26e6b8mhX https://t.co/1lmows639b
RT @m_matuschek: Unterdessen kommen immer mehr Ungereimtheiten ans Licht, zum Beispiel bei Zulassungsstudien von Pfizer 12/ https://t.co/Jl…
@cjsnowdon Growing realisation that vaccine testing is fiddled? https://t.co/xyC8y6QFwS
@Saintgrax1 @Indigenous36350 1. There was a trial site in Argentina. See experiences of Augusto Roux: https://t.co/E9L3xhNEW6 2. Also look at how Pfizer treated Maddie de Garay (google her). 3. BMJ article https://t.co/pPMrBydkv7
@jonathanstea -a new low! Academic papers not online ? I s he really this ignorant? Pfizer data issues &the Covid Jab. https://t.co/HZJghruiu6 risk benefit analysis Boosters & adolesents https://t.co/d1tJR4pNgH I am curious as to who his target
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 元ファイザー社員の医師が「書いて欲しい事」を募集していたので査読論文を元に聞いてみるとブロックされました。「都合の悪いデータは遮断する」これが製薬会社の考えならば薬害が無くなることは無いでしょう。 https://t.co/yrdrkC…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 元ファイザー社員の医師が「書いて欲しい事」を募集していたので査読論文を元に聞いてみるとブロックされました。「都合の悪いデータは遮断する」これが製薬会社の考えならば薬害が無くなることは無いでしょう。 https://t.co/yrdrkC…
@CAnsermoz @MichelJeanDomi1 @24heuresch @Thomas_Binder @LeTemps @Lematinch @RTSinfo Censure de la lanceuse d'alerte Brook Jackson qui travaillait pour l'essai clinique du vaccin Pfizer et a dénoncé les pratiques frauduleuses: https://t.co/fNPU4Qv1Zh Pourq
RT @filipe_rafaeli: A BMJ, uma das mais respeitáveis revistas médicas do mundo, com uns 200 anos, publicou uma reportagem sobre o estudo da…
RT @filipe_rafaeli: A BMJ, uma das mais respeitáveis revistas médicas do mundo, com uns 200 anos, publicou uma reportagem sobre o estudo da…
@carter84262 @goddeketal IMHO, you shouldn’t trust a company that holds the world record for the largest criminal fine ever. Science is to question and enquire. But you can keep your delusion. https://t.co/eGdHFKO5oQ
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ https://t.co/HIUlJ5W0lL
RT @SuspicicMinds: @SHomburg Die Whisleblowerin @IamBrookJackson (Leiterin der klinischen Studien), hat sehr früh auf die "Schlampereien" u…
@jhan2qt @MeanderingRhode @ButHisEmails @smartwookiee @Creativologist @adiosmuchachos4 @muumi_tweets @CentristRn @cheesenuggz @cosmicallylarg1 @doritmi @DrAcula987 @dr_jon_l @DrKatEpi These trials? The ones contracted by the manufacturer to check the effic
RT @SuspicicMinds: @SHomburg Die Whisleblowerin @IamBrookJackson (Leiterin der klinischen Studien), hat sehr früh auf die "Schlampereien" u…
RT @SuspicicMinds: @SHomburg Die Whisleblowerin @IamBrookJackson (Leiterin der klinischen Studien), hat sehr früh auf die "Schlampereien" u…