↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 6,536)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
620 Mendeley
Title
Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Borges Viana, João Pedro Araújo Naves, Victor Silveira Coswig, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, James Steele, James Peter Fisher, Paulo Gentil

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 754 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 620 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 103 17%
Student > Master 97 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 8%
Other 40 6%
Researcher 33 5%
Other 132 21%
Unknown 164 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 183 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 3%
Other 46 7%
Unknown 198 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#12,554
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#43
of 6,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215
of 457,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.