↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 5,064)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
817 tweeters
facebook
33 Facebook pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Borges Viana, João Pedro Araújo Naves, Victor Silveira Coswig, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, James Steele, James Peter Fisher, Paulo Gentil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 817 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 19%
Other 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Unspecified 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Other 64 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 57 29%
Unspecified 44 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Other 19 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 917. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,765
of 13,514,491 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#22
of 5,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257
of 343,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.