↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 5,563)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
Title
Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Borges Viana, João Pedro Araújo Naves, Victor Silveira Coswig, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, James Steele, James Peter Fisher, Paulo Gentil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 787 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 416 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 19%
Student > Bachelor 70 17%
Other 36 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Researcher 28 7%
Other 98 24%
Unknown 69 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 124 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 103 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 993. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,053
of 16,320,682 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#24
of 5,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250
of 395,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,320,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.