↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Article Metrics

Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 5,220)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
816 tweeters
facebook
33 Facebook pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
Title
Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Borges Viana, João Pedro Araújo Naves, Victor Silveira Coswig, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, James Steele, James Peter Fisher, Paulo Gentil

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 816 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 275 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 20%
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Other 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 23 8%
Other 66 24%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 82 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 58 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 959. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,044
of 14,404,451 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#23
of 5,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259
of 378,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,404,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.