RT @HaramHussy: This is not a joke. It is not a parody. This is the British Medical Journal, arguing that it should be possible to kill…
😡😡😡
RT @HaramHussy: This is not a joke. It is not a parody. This is the British Medical Journal, arguing that it should be possible to kill…
RT @HaramHussy: This is not a joke. It is not a parody. This is the British Medical Journal, arguing that it should be possible to kill…
RT @HaramHussy: This is not a joke. It is not a parody. This is the British Medical Journal, arguing that it should be possible to kill…
RT @HaramHussy: This is not a joke. It is not a parody. This is the British Medical Journal, arguing that it should be possible to kill…
This is not a joke. It is not a parody. This is the British Medical Journal, arguing that it should be possible to kill a child after it is born for any reason that is considered acceptable for a pre-birth abortion. https://t.co/GhqI0b4nf5 https://t.c
@taradublinrocks @RepAnnWagner "Post birth abortion," does exist. Not only were they performed by Dr. Gosnell, but this peer reviewed journal talks about the concept. https://t.co/PPLQiv3dt5
@DrJenGunter "Post birth abortion," does exist. Not only were they performed by Dr. Gosnell, but this peer reviewed journal talks about the concept. https://t.co/PPLQiv3dt5
@TashaWasha123 @ScottWalker Gay marriage, assisted suicide, marijuana, etc were once against the law. Perhaps laws against "post birth abortion" might change, too. #AbortionBill #abortionishealthcare https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@RSuzanneKelly @ScottWalker Perhaps someday laws against "after birth abortion" may change, just like laws against marijuana, gay marriage, and euthanasia of adults changed.... https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@JennSawka63 @ScottWalker Actually, "after birth abortion" IS supported by some doctors: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@LDrakston @ScottWalker Yes you can, according to British Medical Journal: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@goodboysit @ScottWalker Should parents be allowed to "euthanize" an unwanted, but otherwise healthy newborn? https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@GingerJoSpice @ScottWalker One could argue: why should the mother of a "defective" newborn baby have more "rights" than the mother of a healthy, but unwanted newborn? https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@HartKariann @ScottWalker There is some truth to the "post birth abortion" theory: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@CydVotesDem @ScottWalker ....not yet. Some doctors, however, DO support abortion after birth: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@popparomeo @ScottWalker Actually, Scott Walker is telling the truth! Some doctors ARE advocating for "post birth abortion": https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@chefkatebrown @ScottWalker Actually, some doctors ARE advocating for "post birth abortion". An unwanted newborn is little different than an unwanted dog, which CAN be terminated. https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@mgilpatrick @ScottWalker They said that euthanasia, gay marriage, etc was never going to happen. One day, Democrats and doctors WILL be advocating for "post birth abortion": https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@hxernst @ScottWalker It IS a "thing" according to the British Medical Journal: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@yinzer81 @ScottWalker Actually, Scott is telling the truth: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@MS_GoGo @ScottWalker One day, terminating unwanted newborns may be legal, just like euthanasia etc: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@jvanleir @EvanHurst @ScottWalker Actually, some doctors consider termination of un unwanted newborn to be "After birth abortion": https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@LynnR3dh3ad @ScottWalker I hope that this "explanation" from the British Medical Journal helps: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@MCharlesPerry @ScottWalker If a 3rd trimester fetus can be safely delivered, how is that not murder? Some doctors ARE saying that you CAN terminate a pregnancy that has completed: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@pastlifedoctor @ScottWalker Some doctors DO support "after birth abortion": https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@coton_luver @ScottWalker Not true! https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@Kathatestrump @ScottWalker Actually, some ARE trying to advocate for "after birth abortion ": https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@RebeccaBowling @ScottWalker Some doctors are actually arguing for the legalization of after birth abortion (infanticide) https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@SpacePirateUSA @ScottWalker It's not a lie according to the British Medical Journal https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@jryter @DGComedy @ScottWalker Actually, some ARE arguing for "after birth abortion" in this British Medical Journal article: https://t.co/ptsMuzD9l9
@shaylakraze @Mominsweats @SenJeffMerkley @ClaraJeffery oh, i see now. well, one example of this mindset: "...then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn."https:/
RT @cees_dekker: Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019 https://t.co/A1QjTVwMdh
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
@WallyStummy @theladykatie And some "intellectual elites" have tried to create justification for that in peer reviewed papers. https://t.co/QyDp0FBule
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @cees_dekker: Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019 https://t.co/A1QjTVwMdh
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @DennyBurk: Horrific. Evil. From the Journal of Medical Ethics: “The authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @LarsepediaJong: Het jaagt je toch angst aan dat mensen zo over een mensenleven kunnen beslissen. 😳 https://t.co/10hw78i804
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
Holy shit. Pro-choice (which I am) should not and cannot extend to goddamn fucking actual infanticide. I desperately hope this is just a random paper that won't become reality one horrible day.
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
Dit is een grens waarvan ik dacht dat we die niet zouden denken te passeren.
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @David_Boogerd: Zieke ontwikkeling. De stap van abortus naar infanticide wordt steeds vaker gezet door serieuze academici. Zie ook Peter…
RT @cees_dekker: Welkom in de seculiere wereld anno 2019 https://t.co/A1QjTVwMdh
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
This is what the left is pushing esto es lo k promueve el comunismo!!
Despicable.
If "[a]bortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health", then "killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled" https://t.co/C
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
De ijskoude argumentie. Onvoorstelbaar.
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @johnpauldickson: "Killing a newborn should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
Is een tamelijk oud artikel. Langs de andere kant is het natuurlijk duidelijk dat er een sterke groep ontstaat voor wie een foetus - in naam van "vrijheid"/"vrouwenrechten - nooit veilig mag zijn.
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? https://t.co/mz6ayENpuV
After-birth abortion is moord. Simpel. https://t.co/fHCLr0zCQ2
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…
RT @SBergsma: I warned this evil could go mainstream but was called crazy. // After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? | Journal of…